CIFU vs. ADBG
CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. CIFU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.
Performance
CIFU vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFU achieves a 90.91% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -52.94% return.
CIFU
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 94.18%
- YTD
- 90.91%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADBG
- 1D
- -4.56%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- -52.94%
- 6M
- -46.73%
- 1Y
- -70.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFU vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF | 90.91% | -6.67% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -52.94% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFU and ADBG is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFU vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
CIFU
ADBG
CIFU vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIFU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | -0.91 | +1.90 |
Drawdowns
CIFU vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFU drawdown since its inception was -77.20%, roughly equal to the maximum ADBG drawdown of -76.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFU and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.20% | -76.71% | -0.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.09% | -71.42% | +62.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -41.64% | -3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 50.12% | — |
Volatility
CIFU vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 27.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 206.19% | 67.26% | +138.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 66.94% | +139.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 206.19% | 66.94% | +139.25% |
CIFU vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIFU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIFU vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFU nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFU and ADBG have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CIFU.
CIFU and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CIFU and 0.75% for ADBG.
Find the right allocation for CIFU and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer