PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIFR vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIFR vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 39.16% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 21.57% return.


CIFR

1D
16.97%
1M
-29.61%
6M
9.26%
YTD
39.16%
1Y
222.96%
3Y*
67.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.38%

JNJ

1D
-1.67%
1M
8.95%
6M
15.06%
YTD
21.57%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
10.10%
ALL TIME*
12.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIFR vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
39.16%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.65%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
21.57%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%-0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CIFR and JNJ is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

-0.03

The correlation between CIFR and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to -0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIFR:

$8.40B

JNJ:

$598.96B

EPS

CIFR:

-$2.32

JNJ:

$8.63

PS Ratio

CIFR:

45.51

JNJ:

6.29

PB Ratio

CIFR:

11.65

JNJ:

7.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIFR:

$174.98M

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIFR:

-$172.84M

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIFR:

-$169.22M

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIFR vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIFR vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIFRJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.53

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

5.12

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

14.40

-5.94

CIFR vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIFR Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIFR and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIFR vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIFRJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.16%

-50.67%

-46.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.38%

-10.96%

-40.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.74%

-15.95%

-55.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.61%

-6.89%

-22.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.31%

-11.88%

-53.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.50%

3.89%

+22.61%

Volatility

CIFR vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 33.12% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 9.47%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIFRJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.12%

9.47%

+23.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

74.07%

14.38%

+59.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.94%

18.08%

+92.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.73%

17.34%

+104.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

121.73%

18.70%

+103.03%

Dividends

CIFR vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.11%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

CIFR vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Digital Inc. and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
24.06B
(CIFR) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIFR and JNJ have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (33.12%) compared to JNJ (9.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIFR and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer