CIFR vs. ASST
CIFR (Cipher Digital Inc.) and ASST (Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock) are both stocks. CIFR operates in Information Technology Services (Technology), while ASST operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 3 years, CIFR returned 113.71%/yr vs -56.18%/yr for ASST. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIFR vs. ASST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIFR achieves a 65.99% return, which is significantly higher than ASST's 2.64% return.
CIFR
- 1D
- 8.26%
- 1M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 65.99%
- 6M
- 43.70%
- 1Y
- 558.60%
- 3Y*
- 113.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASST
- 1D
- 3.91%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- -12.25%
- 1Y
- -86.92%
- 3Y*
- -56.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFR vs. ASST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CIFR Cipher Digital Inc. | 65.99% | 218.10% | 12.35% | 106.50% |
ASST Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock | 2.64% | 50.46% | -84.65% | -89.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIFR and ASST is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023 | 0.15 |
The correlation between CIFR and ASST shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CIFR:
$9.93B
ASST:
$933.69M
CIFR:
-$2.33
ASST:
-$25.54
CIFR:
53.84
ASST:
71.38
CIFR:
$174.98M
ASST:
$5.73M
CIFR:
-$172.84M
ASST:
-$7.43M
CIFR:
-$169.22M
ASST:
-$304.63M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIFR vs. ASST — Risk / Return Rank
CIFR
ASST
CIFR vs. ASST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIFR | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.91 | +0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.56 | -0.92 | +11.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.19 | -1.12 | +22.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIFR vs. ASST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIFR drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum ASST drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIFR and ASST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIFR | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -98.78% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.38% | -95.98% | +44.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.74% | -97.25% | +25.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -97.42% | +90.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.24% | -90.39% | +24.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.57% | 78.47% | -52.90% |
Volatility
CIFR vs. ASST - Volatility Comparison
Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a higher volatility of 31.19% compared to Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock (ASST) at 23.80%. This indicates that CIFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIFR | ASST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.19% | 23.80% | +7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.25% | 81.69% | -9.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 109.30% | 162.68% | -53.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 121.97% | 322.54% | -200.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.97% | 322.54% | -200.57% |
Dividends
CIFR vs. ASST - Dividend Comparison
Neither CIFR nor ASST has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CIFR vs. ASST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cipher Digital Inc. and Asset Entities Inc. Class B Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CIFR and ASST have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIFR has higher volatility (31.19%) compared to ASST (23.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIFR dropped -97.16% vs ASST's -98.78%.
CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.98 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIFR and ASST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer