CIF vs. RPHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. RPHIX is managed by RiverPark Funds. It was launched on Sep 30, 2010.
Performance
CIF vs. RPHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. RPHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 0.71% | 4.76% | 6.71% | 5.87% | 2.97% | 2.05% | 1.95% | 2.77% | 2.44% | 2.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly lower than RPHIX's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has outperformed RPHIX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while RPHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.48% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
RPHIX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 3.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. RPHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RPHIX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. RPHIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
RPHIX
CIF vs. RPHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 4.37 | -3.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 7.68 | -7.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 2.91 | -1.82 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 10.98 | -10.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 76.75 | -74.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 4.37 | -3.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 3.56 | -3.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 2.90 | -2.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 2.91 | -2.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and RPHIX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. RPHIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, more than RPHIX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
RPHIX RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund | 4.11% | 4.76% | 6.40% | 5.08% | 3.46% | 2.03% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 2.83% | 2.68% | 2.63% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. RPHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than RPHIX's maximum drawdown of -3.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and RPHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -3.16% | -66.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -0.41% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -0.92% | -44.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -3.16% | -42.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -0.31% | -22.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -0.09% | -17.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 0.06% | +2.59% |
Volatility
CIF vs. RPHIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to RiverPark Short Term High Yield Fund (RPHIX) at 0.40%. This indicates that CIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | RPHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 0.40% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 0.70% | +7.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 1.02% | +12.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 1.27% | +15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 1.20% | +18.23% |