CIF vs. MFEIX
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. MFEIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Jul 10, 1997.
Performance
CIF vs. MFEIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. MFEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
MFEIX MFS Growth I | -13.62% | 12.34% | 49.67% | 36.15% | -31.14% | 23.59% | 31.65% | 37.69% | 2.30% | 30.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly higher than MFEIX's -13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, CIF has underperformed MFEIX with an annualized return of 6.17%, while MFEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.44% annualized return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
MFEIX
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- -13.62%
- 6M
- -14.22%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 21.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. MFEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEIX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. MFEIX — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
MFEIX
CIF vs. MFEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | MFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.30 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.22 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 0.74 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | MFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.30 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.50 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.73 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.41 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and MFEIX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. MFEIX - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, less than MFEIX's 17.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
MFEIX MFS Growth I | 17.36% | 14.99% | 25.47% | 4.86% | 1.05% | 2.76% | 3.57% | 1.57% | 3.78% | 2.50% | 1.61% | 3.65% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. MFEIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, roughly equal to the maximum MFEIX drawdown of -72.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and MFEIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | MFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -72.24% | +3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -17.30% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -36.11% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -36.11% | -9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -17.30% | -6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -23.85% | +6.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 5.06% | -2.41% |
Volatility
CIF vs. MFEIX - Volatility Comparison
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and MFS Growth I (MFEIX) have volatilities of 5.35% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | MFEIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 5.58% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 12.05% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 21.56% | -8.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 21.87% | -5.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 21.16% | -1.73% |