CIF vs. LOUP
Compare and contrast key facts about MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP).
CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988. LOUP is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2018. Both CIF and LOUP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CIF vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIF vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -10.81% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | -9.90% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -19.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIF achieves a -2.21% return, which is significantly higher than LOUP's -9.90% return.
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
LOUP
- 1D
- 5.39%
- 1M
- -8.01%
- YTD
- -9.90%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 24.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIF vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIF has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIF vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
CIF
LOUP
CIF vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 1.48 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | 2.08 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.29 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.34 | -1.83 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 8.09 | -6.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 1.48 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.14 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.44 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIF and LOUP is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CIF vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
CIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.96%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
CIF vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIF drawdown since its inception was -69.23%, which is greater than LOUP's maximum drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIF and LOUP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.23% | -58.68% | -10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.68% | -21.00% | +11.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -55.63% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.30% | -16.74% | -6.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.80% | -20.42% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 6.07% | -3.42% |
Volatility
CIF vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) is 5.35%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 10.91%. This indicates that CIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 10.91% | -5.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.87% | 21.85% | -13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.40% | 35.07% | -21.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 32.19% | -15.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 31.98% | -12.55% |