CIE.NEO vs. PXF
CIE.NEO (iShares International Fundamental Common Class) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CIE.NEO is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed ex US 1000 Index, while PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CIE.NEO returned 11.89%/yr vs 12.61%/yr for PXF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CIE.NEO charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.
Performance
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CIE.NEO is traded in CAD, while PXF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PXF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIE.NEO achieves a 17.83% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, CIE.NEO has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 11.89%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.61% annualized return.
CIE.NEO
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 6.26%
- YTD
- 17.83%
- 6M
- 19.92%
- 1Y
- 39.49%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
PXF
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 9.05%
- YTD
- 21.95%
- 6M
- 23.86%
- 1Y
- 46.01%
- 3Y*
- 26.58%
- 5Y*
- 16.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.61%
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 17.83% | 34.92% | 12.83% | 15.59% | -2.83% | 14.42% | 1.33% | 11.29% | -8.19% | 16.74% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 21.95% | 35.98% | 13.52% | 15.85% | -2.62% | 14.88% | 0.85% | 11.72% | -7.62% | 16.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIE.NEO and PXF is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009 | 0.77 |
The correlation between CIE.NEO and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIE.NEO vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank
CIE.NEO
PXF
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIE.NEO | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.61 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 4.40 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.78 | 17.91 | -3.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIE.NEO | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 3.25 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.83 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.65 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIE.NEO drawdown since its inception was -40.08%, which is greater than PXF's maximum drawdown of -31.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIE.NEO and PXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIE.NEO | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.08% | -31.65% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.10% | -10.50% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.44% | -14.42% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.55% | -20.58% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.08% | -31.65% | -8.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.29% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -6.02% | -1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.58% | +0.10% |
Volatility
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares International Fundamental Common Class (CIE.NEO) is 4.85%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that CIE.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIE.NEO | PXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 5.14% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.56% | 12.16% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.95% | 14.24% | -0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 13.39% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 15.22% | +2.97% |
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIE.NEO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CIE.NEO vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison
CIE.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than PXF's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIE.NEO iShares International Fundamental Common Class | 2.12% | 2.53% | 2.82% | 3.08% | 3.32% | 2.89% | 2.15% | 3.63% | 3.12% | 2.67% | 2.80% | 2.44% |
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF | 3.07% | 3.64% | 3.48% | 3.55% | 3.58% | 3.74% | 2.11% | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.78% | 3.21% | 3.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIE.NEO and PXF have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for CIE.NEO.
CIE.NEO is categorized as Global Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. CIE.NEO tracks FTSE RAFI Developed ex US 1000 Index, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for CIE.NEO and 0.45% for PXF.
Find the right allocation for CIE.NEO and PXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer