PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CICVX vs. CVTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CICVX achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than CVTRX's 11.18% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CICVX having a 12.86% annualized return and CVTRX not far ahead at 13.35%.


CICVX

1D
-0.20%
1M
4.98%
YTD
26.74%
6M
24.63%
1Y
44.22%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
8.09%
10Y*
12.86%

CVTRX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.23%
YTD
11.18%
6M
10.06%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*
13.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
26.74%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%0.59%14.21%
CVTRX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund
11.18%17.46%20.66%20.36%-18.45%21.05%22.43%25.97%-3.97%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CICVX and CVTRX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1997

0.91

The correlation between CICVX and CVTRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CICVX vs. CVTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

CVTRX
CVTRX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CVTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CVTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CICVXCVTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.39

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.86

3.01

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.59

13.21

+8.38

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the CVTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICVX and CVTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICVX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than CVTRX's maximum drawdown of -44.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICVX and CVTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CICVXCVTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-44.13%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-9.14%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.79%

-16.45%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-23.30%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

-28.20%

+1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.75%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-5.17%

-12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.08%

+0.01%

Volatility

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a higher volatility of 6.24% compared to Calamos Growth and Income Fund (CVTRX) at 4.92%. This indicates that CICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CVTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CICVXCVTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.24%

4.92%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

9.99%

+3.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.78%

12.53%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

14.95%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.00%

15.43%

-2.43%

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CICVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CVTRX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

CICVX vs. CVTRX - Dividend Comparison

CICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, more than CVTRX's 6.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
9.84%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%
CVTRX
Calamos Growth and Income Fund
6.57%7.38%4.83%4.18%4.02%5.52%3.22%3.56%8.61%7.21%7.31%6.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


CICVX and CVTRX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CICVX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to CVTRX (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICVX dropped -49.33% vs CVTRX's -44.13%.

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CICVX and CVTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer