CIBEY vs. LRCX
CIBEY (Commercial International Bank) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. CIBEY operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CIBEY returned 9.05%/yr vs 48.50%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIBEY achieves a 17.89% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 119.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBEY has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 48.50% annualized return.
CIBEY
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 71.33%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 14.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
LRCX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 22.83%
- YTD
- 119.37%
- 6M
- 111.76%
- 1Y
- 294.10%
- 3Y*
- 84.93%
- 5Y*
- 44.33%
- 10Y*
- 48.50%
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBEY Commercial International Bank | 17.89% | 75.29% | 13.17% | 9.14% | -43.33% | 15.34% | -25.09% | 54.40% | -3.66% | 21.88% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 119.37% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIBEY and LRCX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2009 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
CIBEY:
$8.79B
LRCX:
$473.29B
CIBEY:
EGP 24.39
LRCX:
$5.29
CIBEY:
5.23
LRCX:
70.88
CIBEY:
0.10
LRCX:
5.36
CIBEY:
2.03
LRCX:
21.93
CIBEY:
2.03
LRCX:
44.71
CIBEY:
EGP 213.89B
LRCX:
$21.68B
CIBEY:
EGP 145.31B
LRCX:
$10.84B
CIBEY:
EGP 117.63B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIBEY vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
CIBEY
LRCX
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commercial International Bank (CIBEY) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIBEY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.60 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 14.81 | -12.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 49.16 | -41.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIBEY drawdown since its inception was -64.26%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBEY and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIBEY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.26% | -87.90% | +23.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.18% | -20.01% | -7.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.18% | -47.10% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.36% | -56.39% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.97% | -56.39% | -2.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -8.48% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.35% | -28.15% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.50% | 6.01% | +3.49% |
Volatility
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Commercial International Bank (CIBEY) is 9.89%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 24.10%. This indicates that CIBEY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIBEY | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 24.10% | -14.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.84% | 44.62% | -12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 54.30% | -16.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.56% | 46.97% | -9.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 45.11% | -8.17% |
Dividends
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
CIBEY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBEY Commercial International Bank | 0.00% | 2.06% | 0.82% | 1.38% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 1.92% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.57% | 1.86% | 2.30% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commercial International Bank and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CIBEY vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
CIBEY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial International Bank reported a gross profit of 38.92B and revenue of 64.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
CIBEY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial International Bank reported an operating income of 28.44B and revenue of 64.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 43.8%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
CIBEY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial International Bank reported a net income of 19.83B and revenue of 64.87B, resulting in a net margin of 30.6%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIBEY and LRCX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (24.10%) compared to CIBEY (9.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBEY dropped -64.26% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIBEY and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer