CIB vs. SIVR
CIB (Bancolombia S.A.) is a stock, while SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) is Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, CIB returned 15.00%/yr vs 15.87%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIB vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIB achieves a 15.74% return, which is significantly higher than SIVR's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CIB has underperformed SIVR with an annualized return of 15.00%, while SIVR has yielded a comparatively higher 15.87% annualized return.
CIB
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 15.74%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 68.93%
- 3Y*
- 55.70%
- 5Y*
- 29.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.00%
SIVR
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 29.45%
- 1Y
- 114.25%
- 3Y*
- 46.03%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- 15.87%
CIB vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 15.74% | 124.16% | 13.78% | 22.08% | -0.31% | -20.69% | -22.31% | 47.45% | -0.72% | 11.41% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 4.05% | 145.34% | 21.08% | -0.91% | 2.59% | -12.33% | 47.52% | 15.17% | -8.96% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIB and SIVR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2009 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIB vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank
CIB
SIVR
CIB vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIB | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | 2.71 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 5.80 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIB | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.18 | 1.95 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.59 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.32 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
CIB vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIB drawdown since its inception was -93.77%, which is greater than SIVR's maximum drawdown of -75.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB and SIVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIB | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.77% | -75.85% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -42.42% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.95% | -42.42% | +18.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.85% | -42.42% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.38% | -42.42% | -27.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.91% | -36.52% | +23.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.63% | -47.85% | +15.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 19.78% | -10.23% |
Volatility
CIB vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) is 12.72%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 16.32%. This indicates that CIB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIB | SIVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.72% | 16.32% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.31% | 58.30% | -31.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.72% | 58.84% | -27.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.68% | 36.17% | -3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.74% | 31.86% | +3.88% |
Dividends
CIB vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison
CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while SIVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 1.68% | 6.90% | 10.96% | 10.92% | 10.68% | 0.87% | 4.01% | 2.41% | 3.62% | 3.21% | 3.21% | 4.49% |
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CIB and SIVR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIVR has higher volatility (16.32%) compared to CIB (12.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIB dropped -93.77% vs SIVR's -75.85%.
CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIB and SIVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer