PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIB vs. HLF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIB vs. HLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIB achieves a 28.33% return, which is significantly higher than HLF's -6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CIB has outperformed HLF with an annualized return of 16.30%, while HLF has yielded a comparatively lower -8.54% annualized return.


CIB

1D
-0.78%
1M
26.10%
YTD
28.33%
6M
27.75%
1Y
91.39%
3Y*
58.49%
5Y*
32.29%
10Y*
16.30%

HLF

1D
-0.90%
1M
-7.00%
YTD
-6.21%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
46.37%
3Y*
-1.03%
5Y*
-25.81%
10Y*
-8.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIB vs. HLF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
28.33%124.16%13.78%22.08%-0.31%-20.69%-22.31%47.45%-0.72%11.41%
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
-6.21%92.68%-56.16%2.55%-63.65%-14.82%0.80%-19.13%74.10%40.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CIB and HLF is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2004

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CIB:

$19.03B

HLF:

$1.31B

EPS

CIB:

COP 29.17K

HLF:

$2.29

PE Ratio

CIB:

9.58

HLF:

5.28

PS Ratio

CIB:

1.54

HLF:

0.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIB:

COP 43.34T

HLF:

$5.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIB:

COP 25.71T

HLF:

$3.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIB:

COP 10.37T

HLF:

$423.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIB vs. HLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIB
CIB Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIB Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIB Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HLF
HLF Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
HLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIB vs. HLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIBHLFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

1.07

+2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.49

2.50

+6.99

CIB vs. HLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIB Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the HLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIB and HLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIB vs. HLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIB drawdown since its inception was -93.77%, roughly equal to the maximum HLF drawdown of -91.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB and HLF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBHLFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.77%

-91.69%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.95%

-43.39%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.95%

-72.73%

+48.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.85%

-90.58%

+43.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.38%

-91.69%

+21.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-80.33%

+76.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.62%

-31.70%

-0.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.66%

18.62%

-8.96%

Volatility

CIB vs. HLF - Volatility Comparison

Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) has a higher volatility of 13.98% compared to Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. (HLF) at 12.61%. This indicates that CIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBHLFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.98%

12.61%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.21%

39.52%

-12.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.55%

61.20%

-28.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.85%

60.85%

-28.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.79%

49.94%

-14.15%

Dividends

CIB vs. HLF - Dividend Comparison

CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while HLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIB
Bancolombia S.A.
1.52%6.90%10.96%10.92%10.68%0.87%4.01%2.41%3.62%3.21%3.21%4.49%
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CIB vs. HLF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bancolombia S.A. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T20222023202420252026
10.46T
1.32B
(CIB) Total Revenue
(HLF) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CIB values in COP, HLF values in USD

CIB vs. HLF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bancolombia S.A. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
59.2%
77.9%
Portfolio components
CIB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.

HLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.03B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.9%.

CIB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.

HLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported an operating income of -5.50M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.

CIB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.

HLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. reported a net income of 61.90M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CIB and HLF have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIB has higher volatility (13.98%) compared to HLF (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIB dropped -93.77% vs HLF's -91.69%.

CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIB and HLF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer