CIB vs. FIGS
CIB (Bancolombia S.A.) and FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) are both stocks. CIB operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, CIB returned 32.29%/yr vs -18.94%/yr for FIGS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CIB vs. FIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIB achieves a 28.33% return, which is significantly higher than FIGS's 5.28% return.
CIB
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 26.10%
- YTD
- 28.33%
- 6M
- 27.75%
- 1Y
- 91.39%
- 3Y*
- 58.49%
- 5Y*
- 32.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
FIGS
- 1D
- 6.03%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- 5.28%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 129.56%
- 3Y*
- 11.41%
- 5Y*
- -18.94%
- 10Y*
- —
CIB vs. FIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 28.33% | 124.16% | 13.78% | 22.08% | -0.31% | 8.52% |
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 5.28% | 83.52% | -10.94% | 3.27% | -75.58% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CIB and FIGS is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
CIB:
$19.03B
FIGS:
$2.35B
CIB:
COP 29.17K
FIGS:
$0.22
CIB:
9.58
FIGS:
54.44
CIB:
0.57
FIGS:
0.21
CIB:
1.54
FIGS:
3.32
CIB:
1.82
FIGS:
5.45
CIB:
COP 43.34T
FIGS:
$666.10M
CIB:
COP 25.71T
FIGS:
$443.68M
CIB:
COP 10.37T
FIGS:
$56.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIB vs. FIGS — Risk / Return Rank
CIB
FIGS
CIB vs. FIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CIB | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.38 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 3.82 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.49 | 10.67 | -1.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CIB vs. FIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIB drawdown since its inception was -93.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FIGS drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIB and FIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIB | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.77% | -92.77% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.95% | -34.11% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.95% | -57.56% | +33.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.85% | -92.77% | +45.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.43% | -76.13% | +72.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.62% | -75.87% | +43.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.66% | 12.19% | -2.53% |
Volatility
CIB vs. FIGS - Volatility Comparison
Bancolombia S.A. (CIB) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) have volatilities of 13.98% and 13.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CIB | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.98% | 13.33% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.21% | 51.28% | -24.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.55% | 62.47% | -29.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.85% | 70.12% | -37.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 70.30% | -34.51% |
Dividends
CIB vs. FIGS - Dividend Comparison
CIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while FIGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB Bancolombia S.A. | 1.52% | 6.90% | 10.96% | 10.92% | 10.68% | 0.87% | 4.01% | 2.41% | 3.62% | 3.21% | 3.21% | 4.49% |
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CIB vs. FIGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bancolombia S.A. and FIGS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CIB vs. FIGS - Profitability Comparison
CIB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a gross profit of 6.19T and revenue of 10.46T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.2%.
FIGS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a gross profit of 108.30M and revenue of 159.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.7%.
CIB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported an operating income of 2.15T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
FIGS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.48M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
CIB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bancolombia S.A. reported a net income of 1.46T and revenue of 10.46T, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.
FIGS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FIGS, Inc. reported a net income of 6.29M and revenue of 159.90M, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CIB and FIGS have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIB has higher volatility (13.98%) compared to FIGS (13.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIB dropped -93.77% vs FIGS's -92.77%.
CIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CIB and FIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer