CIAI.TO vs. POET

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

CIAI.TO (CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF) is Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by CI, while POET (POET Technologies Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, CIAI.TO returned 31.56% vs 37.92% for POET. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CIAI.TO is traded in CAD, while POET is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the POET values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CIAI.TO having a 19.72% return and POET slightly lower at 19.05%.

CIAI.TO

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: -4.04%
• 6M: 17.06%
• YTD: 19.72%
• 1Y: 31.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.70%

POET

• 1D: 5.37%
• 1M: -17.14%
• 6M: 29.59%
• YTD: 19.05%
• 1Y: 37.92%
• 3Y*: 23.84%
• 5Y*: -1.18%
• 10Y*: 1.98%
• ALL TIME*: 0.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	CA$1.13M	CA$1.20M	CA$2.71M
POET POET Technologies Inc	CA$114.23M	CA$128.63M	CA$566.76M

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF	19.72%	18.84%	29.92%
POET POET Technologies Inc	19.05%	1.53%	194.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CIAI.TO and POET is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2024	0.43

Return for Risk

CIAI.TO vs. POET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CIAI.TO

CIAI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 38
CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
CIAI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CIAI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 37
CIAI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CIAI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

POET

POET Risk / Return Rank: 62
POET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
POET Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
POET Omega Ratio Rank: 70
POET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
POET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and POET Technologies Inc (POET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CIAI.TO	POET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.27	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	1.52	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.19	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	0.56	+0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.79	1.10	+2.68

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIAI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the POET Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIAI.TO and POET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum POET drawdown of -92.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and POET.

Drawdown Indicators

	CIAI.TO	POET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.22%	-92.94%	+61.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.93%	-68.13%	+49.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-82.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-91.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.81%	-63.39%	+53.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-59.11%	+52.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	34.49%	-27.29%

Volatility

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) is 10.77%, while POET Technologies Inc (POET) has a volatility of 30.70%. This indicates that CIAI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CIAI.TO	POET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.77%	30.70%	-19.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.36%	123.37%	-100.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.32%	141.70%	-113.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.48%	108.13%	-78.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.48%	99.96%	-70.48%

Dividends

CIAI.TO vs. POET - Dividend Comparison

Neither CIAI.TO nor POET has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CIAI.TO and POET in my portfolio?

CIAI.TO and POET have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.