CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ).
CIAI.TO and ARKQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CIAI.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Investments. It was launched on May 2, 2024. ARKQ is an actively managed fund by ARK. It was launched on Sep 30, 2014.
Performance
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | -4.24% | 18.84% | 29.92% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 1.14% | 41.98% | 48.32% |
Different Trading Currencies
CIAI.TO is traded in CAD, while ARKQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIAI.TO achieves a -4.24% return, which is significantly lower than ARKQ's 1.14% return.
CIAI.TO
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -4.24%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- 1Y
- 35.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKQ
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 67.55%
- 3Y*
- 32.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 21.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CIAI.TO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ — Risk / Return Rank
CIAI.TO
ARKQ
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) and ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIAI.TO | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.89 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.68 | 2.48 | -0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.28 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 9.44 | -4.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIAI.TO | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.89 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIAI.TO and ARKQ is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Dividend Comparison
CIAI.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARKQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIAI.TO CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ARKQ ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 2.86% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.98% |
Drawdowns
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIAI.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum ARKQ drawdown of -57.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIAI.TO and ARKQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIAI.TO | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.22% | -59.89% | +28.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.93% | -20.58% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.68% | -14.58% | +0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.87% | -17.43% | +10.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 6.60% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CIAI.TO vs. ARKQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CI Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (CIAI.TO) is 9.84%, while ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF (ARKQ) has a volatility of 11.62%. This indicates that CIAI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIAI.TO | ARKQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.84% | 11.62% | -1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.32% | 25.48% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.76% | 35.88% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 29.85% | -1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.70% | 27.73% | +0.97% |