PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CI vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CI having a 9.53% annualized return and KO not far behind at 9.15%.


CI

1D
3.14%
1M
3.25%
YTD
6.37%
6M
10.29%
1Y
-4.86%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
9.53%

KO

1D
3.46%
1M
0.32%
YTD
14.47%
6M
14.32%
1Y
15.33%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
9.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CI vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CI
Cigna Corporation
6.37%1.72%-6.27%-7.97%46.68%12.29%1.83%7.70%-6.46%52.29%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
14.47%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.47%20.60%6.77%14.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CI and KO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1982

0.30

The correlation between CI and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CI:

$76.43B

KO:

$342.88B

EPS

CI:

$23.59

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

CI:

12.27

KO:

25.02

PEG Ratio

CI:

0.71

KO:

3.02

PS Ratio

CI:

0.28

KO:

6.96

PB Ratio

CI:

1.81

KO:

10.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

CI:

$277.94B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CI:

$19.38B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

CI:

$10.03B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CI vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
CI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CI vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.17

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

1.95

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.34

3.82

-4.15

CI vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CIKODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.94

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.65

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.50

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.53

-0.19

Drawdowns

CI vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.34%

-68.23%

-16.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.54%

-7.89%

-18.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.10%

-16.26%

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.10%

-17.27%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-36.99%

-5.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.21%

-2.98%

-15.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.82%

-16.09%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.51%

4.03%

+10.48%

Volatility

CI vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 5.91%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.35%

5.91%

+3.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.86%

12.38%

+6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.18%

16.37%

+16.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.43%

16.10%

+12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.75%

18.20%

+12.55%

Dividends

CI vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than KO's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CI
Cigna Corporation
2.12%2.19%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.59%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

CI vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
68.49B
12.47B
(CI) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CI vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cigna Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
63.0%
Portfolio components
CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CI and KO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CI has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to KO (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CI and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer