CI vs. KO
CI (Cigna Corporation) and KO (The Coca-Cola Company) are both stocks. CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare), while KO operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, CI returned 9.53%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for KO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CI vs. KO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CI having a 9.53% annualized return and KO not far behind at 9.15%.
CI
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- -4.86%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
KO
- 1D
- 3.46%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 15.33%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.40%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
CI vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 6.37% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 14.47% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CI and KO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1982 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CI and KO shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CI:
$76.43B
KO:
$342.88B
CI:
$23.59
KO:
$3.18
CI:
12.27
KO:
25.02
CI:
0.71
KO:
3.02
CI:
0.28
KO:
6.96
CI:
1.81
KO:
10.19
CI:
$277.94B
KO:
$49.28B
CI:
$19.38B
KO:
$30.43B
CI:
$10.03B
KO:
$18.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CI vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank
CI
KO
CI vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.17 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.95 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.34 | 3.82 | -4.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 | 0.94 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.65 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.50 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.53 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CI vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than KO's maximum drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and KO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -68.23% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.54% | -7.89% | -18.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.10% | -16.26% | -15.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.10% | -17.27% | -14.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -36.99% | -5.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -2.98% | -15.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.82% | -16.09% | -2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.51% | 4.03% | +10.48% |
Volatility
CI vs. KO - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 5.91%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CI | KO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 5.91% | +3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.86% | 12.38% | +6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.18% | 16.37% | +16.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.43% | 16.10% | +12.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 18.20% | +12.55% |
Dividends
CI vs. KO - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than KO's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 2.12% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
CI vs. KO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CI vs. KO - Profitability Comparison
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CI and KO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CI has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to KO (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CI dropped -84.34% vs KO's -68.23%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CI and KO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer