CHYDX vs. PRFRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX).
CHYDX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Aug 2, 1999. PRFRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 29, 2011.
Performance
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | -0.47% | 6.72% | 7.78% | 12.26% | -10.35% | 6.44% | 4.78% | 14.29% | -4.30% | 6.05% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 0.05% | 13.09% | 8.80% | 13.78% | -1.95% | 4.60% | 1.75% | 8.46% | -0.08% | 3.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than PRFRX's 0.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX has underperformed PRFRX with an annualized return of 5.12%, while PRFRX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.67% annualized return.
CHYDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 5.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
PRFRX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRFRX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHYDX vs. PRFRX — Risk / Return Rank
CHYDX
PRFRX
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHYDX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | 3.59 | -1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 7.18 | -4.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 2.36 | -0.92 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 5.93 | -4.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.54 | 28.58 | -20.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHYDX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | 3.59 | -1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 2.49 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 1.45 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 1.43 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHYDX and PRFRX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Dividend Comparison
CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, less than PRFRX's 12.92% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHYDX Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund | 5.74% | 6.39% | 6.30% | 6.28% | 5.47% | 4.48% | 5.26% | 5.85% | 6.62% | 4.87% | 4.94% | 5.43% |
PRFRX T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund | 12.92% | 12.91% | 8.17% | 9.57% | 4.03% | 3.86% | 4.00% | 4.84% | 4.87% | 4.04% | 4.07% | 4.07% |
Drawdowns
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than PRFRX's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and PRFRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHYDX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -20.05% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | -1.96% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.66% | -5.94% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.35% | -20.05% | -3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.60% | -0.53% | -1.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.78% | -0.69% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 0.43% | +0.18% |
Volatility
CHYDX vs. PRFRX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PRFRX) at 0.71%. This indicates that CHYDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHYDX | PRFRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.04% | 0.71% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.60% | 2.11% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00% | 3.33% | -0.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 2.90% | +1.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 3.92% | +1.04% |