PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHYDX vs. CCVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHYDX achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly lower than CCVIX's 26.89% return. Over the past 10 years, CHYDX has underperformed CCVIX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while CCVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.


CHYDX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.63%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.17%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
5.01%

CCVIX

1D
1.37%
1M
5.16%
YTD
26.89%
6M
24.44%
1Y
44.88%
3Y*
19.95%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
2.03%6.72%7.78%12.26%-10.35%6.44%4.78%14.29%-4.30%6.05%
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
26.89%18.83%9.71%10.61%-21.23%5.13%48.51%19.18%0.38%14.04%

Correlation

The correlation between CHYDX and CCVIX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 1999

0.59

The correlation between CHYDX and CCVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHYDX vs. CCVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHYDX
CHYDX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHYDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHYDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHYDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CHYDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHYDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CCVIX
CCVIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CCVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CCVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHYDXCCVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.50

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

5.87

-2.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.12

21.59

-4.47

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHYDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the CCVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHYDX and CCVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHYDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, roughly equal to the maximum CCVIX drawdown of -36.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHYDX and CCVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHYDXCCVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-36.56%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.73%

-7.71%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.50%

-14.80%

+11.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.66%

-27.33%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.35%

-27.33%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.76%

-5.88%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

2.09%

-1.72%

Volatility

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund (CHYDX) is 0.63%, while Calamos Convertible Fund (CCVIX) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that CHYDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHYDXCCVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

6.28%

-5.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

13.06%

-11.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

15.73%

-13.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.07%

13.12%

-9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.96%

12.99%

-8.03%

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHYDX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than CCVIX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHYDX vs. CCVIX - Dividend Comparison

CHYDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, less than CCVIX's 7.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CCVIX
Calamos Convertible Fund
7.98%10.25%1.31%1.87%0.60%13.59%6.56%1.00%14.47%3.90%2.84%4.68%
CHYDX
Calamos High Income Opportunities Fund
6.06%6.39%6.30%6.28%5.47%4.48%5.26%5.85%6.62%4.87%4.94%5.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHYDX and CCVIX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CCVIX has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to CHYDX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHYDX dropped -35.03% vs CCVIX's -36.56%.

CCVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHYDX and CCVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer