CHX vs. SLB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ChampionX Corporation (CHX) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB).

Performance

CHX vs. SLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ChampionX Corporation (CHX) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHX vs. SLB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CHX ChampionX Corporation	0.00%	-4.07%	-5.87%	1.87%	44.94%	32.09%	-54.71%	24.74%	-28.74%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	34.69%	3.27%	-24.47%	-0.78%	81.15%	40.30%	-43.81%	17.73%	-46.39%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) CHX : $3.58B SLB : $35.71B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHX : $1.19B SLB : $6.50B
EBITDA (TTM) CHX : $708.96M SLB : $7.15B

Returns By Period

CHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLB

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 34.69%
• 6M: 51.59%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: 4.15%
• 5Y*: 15.31%
• 10Y*: -0.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHX vs. SLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLB

SLB Risk / Return Rank: 63
SLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SLB Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHX vs. SLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChampionX Corporation (CHX) and Schlumberger Limited (SLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHX	SLB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.13	—

Correlation

The correlation between CHX and SLB is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CHX vs. SLB - Dividend Comparison

CHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than SLB's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHX ChampionX Corporation	0.74%	1.10%	1.36%	1.13%	0.78%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SLB Schlumberger Limited	2.24%	2.97%	2.87%	1.92%	1.22%	2.09%	4.01%	4.98%	5.54%	2.97%	2.38%	2.87%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	CHX	SLB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-87.64%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-24.29%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-84.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-39.51%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-31.17%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	14.34%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CHX	SLB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.09%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	39.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	38.16%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	40.36%	—

Financials