SLB vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SLB or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between SLB and ET is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SLB vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SLB:
-0.71
ET:
0.54
SLB:
-0.87
ET:
0.88
SLB:
0.89
ET:
1.12
SLB:
-0.39
ET:
0.58
SLB:
-1.62
ET:
2.03
SLB:
15.38%
ET:
6.99%
SLB:
35.11%
ET:
26.14%
SLB:
-87.63%
ET:
-87.81%
SLB:
-60.50%
ET:
-19.64%
Fundamentals
SLB:
$45.58B
ET:
$57.20B
SLB:
$2.95
ET:
$1.28
SLB:
11.44
ET:
13.02
SLB:
3.25
ET:
0.73
SLB:
1.30
ET:
0.69
SLB:
2.40
ET:
1.62
SLB:
$36.08B
ET:
$61.04B
SLB:
$7.41B
ET:
$10.60B
SLB:
$7.75B
ET:
$11.63B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLB achieves a -8.79% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, SLB has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -6.76%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.42% annualized return.
SLB
-8.79%
-11.43%
-11.49%
-25.20%
18.91%
-6.76%
ET
-13.53%
-5.98%
5.05%
13.01%
26.53%
1.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SLB vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SLB
ET
SLB vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schlumberger Limited (SLB) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SLB vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
SLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than ET's 7.71% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLB Schlumberger Limited | 3.20% | 2.87% | 1.92% | 1.22% | 1.67% | 4.01% | 4.98% | 5.54% | 2.97% | 2.38% | 2.87% | 1.87% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.71% | 6.51% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% |
Drawdowns
SLB vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLB drawdown since its inception was -87.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLB and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SLB vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
Schlumberger Limited (SLB) has a higher volatility of 23.30% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 16.44%. This indicates that SLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
SLB vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Schlumberger Limited and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities