PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHT vs. CDUAF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHT vs. CDUAF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHT achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly lower than CDUAF's 18.15% return. Over the past 10 years, CHT has underperformed CDUAF with an annualized return of 6.65%, while CDUAF has yielded a comparatively higher 7.36% annualized return.


CHT

1D
-1.10%
1M
4.83%
YTD
7.65%
6M
8.35%
1Y
7.00%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
5.54%
10Y*
6.65%

CDUAF

1D
0.00%
1M
1.60%
YTD
18.15%
6M
22.49%
1Y
34.37%
3Y*
15.92%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
7.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHT vs. CDUAF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
7.65%14.87%0.20%11.05%-10.00%13.48%8.57%7.35%5.63%16.48%
CDUAF
Canadian Utilities Limited
18.15%35.10%6.34%-6.25%-1.87%25.16%-14.69%37.49%-19.67%15.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CHT and CDUAF is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2007

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHT:

$36.03B

CDUAF:

$9.82B

EPS

CHT:

$37.38

CDUAF:

$0.29

PE Ratio

CHT:

1.20

CDUAF:

123.88

PS Ratio

CHT:

0.19

CDUAF:

2.83

PB Ratio

CHT:

0.09

CDUAF:

1.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHT:

$181.55B

CDUAF:

$3.46B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHT:

$65.41B

CDUAF:

$1.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHT:

$67.40B

CDUAF:

$1.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHT vs. CDUAF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHT
CHT Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHT Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
CHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHT Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

CDUAF
CDUAF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CDUAF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDUAF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDUAF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CDUAF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDUAF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHT vs. CDUAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHTCDUAFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.41

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

6.46

-5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

15.92

-14.76

CHT vs. CDUAF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHT Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the CDUAF Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHT and CDUAF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHTCDUAFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.17

-1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.51

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.29

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.08

+0.41

Drawdowns

CHT vs. CDUAF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum CDUAF drawdown of -71.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHT and CDUAF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHTCDUAFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.66%

-71.22%

+25.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.03%

-5.35%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.03%

-22.11%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.69%

-31.94%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.69%

-41.92%

+18.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-18.16%

+16.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.16%

-39.90%

+32.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.04%

2.17%

+3.87%

Volatility

CHT vs. CDUAF - Volatility Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Canadian Utilities Limited (CDUAF) have volatilities of 6.11% and 6.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHTCDUAFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

6.36%

-0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

11.43%

-1.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.00%

15.91%

-2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.11%

19.04%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.37%

25.57%

-13.20%

Dividends

CHT vs. CDUAF - Dividend Comparison

CHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, which matches CDUAF's 3.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDUAF
Canadian Utilities Limited
3.71%4.21%5.47%6.05%5.03%4.85%5.32%4.24%4.49%4.82%4.82%5.11%
CHT
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.
3.72%4.00%3.91%3.91%4.35%3.67%3.67%3.91%4.44%3.64%4.32%3.88%

Financials

CHT vs. CDUAF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. and Canadian Utilities Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20222023202420252026
1.90B
1.08B
(CHT) Total Revenue
(CDUAF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHT vs. CDUAF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. and Canadian Utilities Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.9%
70.2%
Portfolio components
CHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 699.36M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

CDUAF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.2%.

CHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 414.17M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

CDUAF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported an operating income of 393.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.3%.

CHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported a net income of 319.57M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.

CDUAF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Utilities Limited reported a net income of 224.00M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHT and CDUAF have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDUAF has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to CHT (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHT dropped -45.66% vs CDUAF's -71.22%.

CDUAF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHT and CDUAF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer