CHT vs. RITM
CHT (Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd.) and RITM (Rithm Capital Corp.) are both stocks. CHT operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while RITM operates in REIT - Mortgage (Real Estate). Over the past 10 years, CHT returned 6.65%/yr vs 6.32%/yr for RITM. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHT vs. RITM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHT achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than RITM's -15.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CHT having a 6.65% annualized return and RITM not far behind at 6.32%.
CHT
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 7.65%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.54%
- 10Y*
- 6.65%
RITM
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- -6.43%
- YTD
- -15.04%
- 6M
- -17.04%
- 1Y
- -11.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
CHT vs. RITM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | 7.65% | 14.87% | 0.20% | 11.05% | -10.00% | 13.48% | 8.57% | 7.35% | 5.63% | 16.48% |
RITM Rithm Capital Corp. | -15.04% | 10.06% | 11.07% | 45.60% | -14.44% | 17.07% | -34.36% | 28.46% | -10.35% | 27.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHT and RITM is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2013 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
CHT:
$36.03B
RITM:
$5.10B
CHT:
$37.38
RITM:
$1.31
CHT:
1.20
RITM:
6.88
CHT:
0.19
RITM:
0.89
CHT:
0.09
RITM:
0.68
CHT:
$181.55B
RITM:
$5.61B
CHT:
$65.41B
RITM:
$4.84B
CHT:
$67.40B
RITM:
$1.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHT vs. RITM — Risk / Return Rank
CHT
RITM
CHT vs. RITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) and Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHT | RITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 0.92 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.44 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.16 | -0.99 | +2.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHT | RITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | -0.54 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.24 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.16 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.21 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
CHT vs. RITM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHT drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, smaller than the maximum RITM drawdown of -81.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHT and RITM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHT | RITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.66% | -81.11% | +35.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.03% | -27.31% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.03% | -27.31% | +16.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.69% | -36.61% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.69% | -81.11% | +57.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.94% | -23.24% | +21.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -15.95% | +8.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | 12.04% | -6.00% |
Volatility
CHT vs. RITM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. (CHT) is 6.11%, while Rithm Capital Corp. (RITM) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that CHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHT | RITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 7.39% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.63% | 18.84% | -9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.00% | 22.21% | -9.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 27.47% | -14.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.37% | 40.17% | -27.80% |
Dividends
CHT vs. RITM - Dividend Comparison
CHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, less than RITM's 11.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | 3.72% | 4.00% | 3.91% | 3.91% | 4.35% | 3.67% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.44% | 3.64% | 4.32% | 3.88% |
RITM Rithm Capital Corp. | 11.09% | 9.17% | 9.23% | 9.36% | 12.24% | 8.40% | 5.03% | 12.41% | 14.07% | 11.07% | 11.70% | 14.39% |
Financials
CHT vs. RITM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. and Rithm Capital Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHT vs. RITM - Profitability Comparison
CHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 699.36M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
RITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a gross profit of 949.57M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.8%.
CHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of 414.17M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
RITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported an operating income of 142.52M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.
CHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. reported a net income of 319.57M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
RITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rithm Capital Corp. reported a net income of 109.48M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHT and RITM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RITM has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to CHT (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHT dropped -45.66% vs RITM's -81.11%.
CHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.54 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHT and RITM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer