CHPY vs. SNOY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and SNOY (YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 133.11% vs 10.37% for SNOY. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

CHPY vs. SNOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 79.80% return, which is significantly higher than SNOY's 8.61% return.

CHPY

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 13.42%
• YTD: 79.80%
• 6M: 82.24%
• 1Y: 133.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNOY

• 1D: -2.49%
• 1M: 50.38%
• YTD: 8.61%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 10.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPY vs. SNOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	79.80%	56.76%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	8.61%	27.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPY and SNOY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.24

Return for Risk

CHPY vs. SNOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 95
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

SNOY

SNOY Risk / Return Rank: 14
SNOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
SNOY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SNOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SNOY Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPY vs. SNOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPY	SNOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.36	0.18	+4.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.59	0.77	+3.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.67	1.10	+0.57
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.01	0.20	+10.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	39.28	0.45	+38.83

CHPY vs. SNOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPY Sharpe Ratio is 4.36, which is higher than the SNOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPY and SNOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPY vs. SNOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.19%, smaller than the maximum SNOY drawdown of -50.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and SNOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPY	SNOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.19%	-50.90%	+38.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.17%	-50.90%	+38.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-11.86%	+8.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-12.69%	+10.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.40%	23.02%	-19.62%

Volatility

CHPY vs. SNOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) is 17.01%, while YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF (SNOY) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that CHPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPY	SNOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.01%	33.96%	-16.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.28%	47.65%	-21.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.72%	57.45%	-26.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.25%	51.88%	-16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.25%	51.88%	-16.63%

CHPY vs. SNOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CHPY and SNOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

CHPY vs. SNOY - Dividend Comparison

CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.42%, less than SNOY's 70.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	29.42%	28.19%	0.00%
SNOY YieldMax SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF	70.30%	84.96%	33.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPY and SNOY in my portfolio?

CHPY and SNOY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPY or SNOY?

SNOY has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to CHPY (17.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.19% vs SNOY's -50.90%.

Which ETF is better, CHPY or SNOY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 133.11% vs 10.37% for SNOY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CHPY has been the lower-risk option at 17.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPY or SNOY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 133.11% return vs 10.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPY or SNOY?

CHPY and SNOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPY or SNOY?

SNOY has the higher dividend yield at 70.30%, compared with 29.42% for CHPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.