CHPY vs. QQA
CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CHPY returned 149.72% vs 32.22% for QQA. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
CHPY vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPY achieves a 85.77% return, which is significantly higher than QQA's 14.57% return.
CHPY
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 29.53%
- YTD
- 85.77%
- 6M
- 85.49%
- 1Y
- 149.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CHPY vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 85.77% | 62.91% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 29.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPY and QQA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between CHPY and QQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPY vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
CHPY
QQA
CHPY vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 5.47 | 2.57 | +2.90 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.76 | 3.47 | +2.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.81 | 1.46 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.38 | 3.70 | +8.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.28 | 16.59 | +30.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.47 | 2.57 | +2.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.83 | 1.18 | +3.66 |
Drawdowns
CHPY vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPY drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPY and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -19.73% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.17% | -8.76% | -3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.98% | -2.44% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.95% | +1.23% |
Volatility
CHPY vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a higher volatility of 11.23% compared to Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) at 2.91%. This indicates that CHPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPY | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.23% | 2.91% | +8.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 9.68% | +12.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.59% | 12.59% | +15.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 18.27% | +14.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.17% | 18.27% | +14.90% |
CHPY vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPY vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
CHPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.40%, more than QQA's 9.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF | 28.40% | 28.19% | 0.00% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPY and QQA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPY has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to QQA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPY dropped -12.17% vs QQA's -19.73%.
On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs 32.22% for QQA. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs 32.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.
CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CHPY and 0.29% for QQA.
CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPY and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer