CHPX vs. SIL
CHPX (Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPX is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.43 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CHPX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
CHPX vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPX achieves a 60.49% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -11.58% return.
CHPX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -8.69%
- 6M
- 45.81%
- YTD
- 60.49%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SIL
- 1D
- -3.20%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- 6M
- -21.68%
- YTD
- -11.58%
- 1Y
- 56.89%
- 3Y*
- 42.08%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- 5.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.80M | $5.31M | $11.57M | |
| $67.23M | $68.26M | $119.44M |
CHPX vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 60.49% | 6.91% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -11.58% | 17.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPX and SIL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPX vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
CHPX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SIL
CHPX vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPX vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPX drawdown since its inception was -27.10%, smaller than the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPX and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.10% | -82.99% | +55.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.92% | -37.43% | +16.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -51.27% | +45.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.68% | — |
Volatility
CHPX vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPX | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.96% | 53.41% | -8.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 40.12% | +4.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 39.80% | +5.16% |
CHPX vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPX vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
CHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SIL's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPX Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF | 0.04% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.38% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPX and SIL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.04% for CHPX.
CHPX is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while SIL is Silver. CHPX tracks Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CHPX and 0.65% for SIL.
Find the right allocation for CHPX and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer