PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPT vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHPT vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPT achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 10.11% return.


CHPT

1D
-13.12%
1M
13.52%
YTD
8.73%
6M
-30.78%
1Y
-46.68%
3Y*
-66.34%
5Y*
-58.15%
10Y*

NVDA

1D
-6.20%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.58%
1Y
46.72%
3Y*
74.54%
5Y*
63.58%
10Y*
68.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPT vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
8.73%-68.97%-54.27%-75.45%-49.97%-52.47%308.98%0.41%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.11%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%30.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPT and NVDA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019

0.32

The correlation between CHPT and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHPT:

$177.83M

NVDA:

$5.00T

EPS

CHPT:

-$8.70

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

CHPT:

0.41

NVDA:

19.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHPT:

$415.40M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHPT:

$125.56M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHPT:

-$162.44M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPT vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPT
CHPT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CHPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPT Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPT vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPTNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.23

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.64

2.32

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.96

5.67

-6.62

CHPT vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPT and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPTNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

1.35

-2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.73

1.23

-1.97

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

0.62

-1.13

Drawdowns

CHPT vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPT drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPT and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPTNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.51%

-89.72%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.61%

-20.21%

-52.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.69%

-36.88%

-60.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.37%

-66.34%

-33.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.22%

-12.90%

-86.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.89%

-36.20%

-28.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.89%

8.27%

+40.62%

Volatility

CHPT vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a higher volatility of 25.33% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 13.15%. This indicates that CHPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPTNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.33%

13.15%

+12.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.35%

26.39%

+23.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.51%

34.76%

+37.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.59%

51.73%

+27.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

76.94%

49.84%

+27.10%

Dividends

CHPT vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CHPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

CHPT vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
101.82M
81.62B
(CHPT) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHPT vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
27.4%
74.9%
Portfolio components
CHPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.94M and revenue of 101.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

CHPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.80M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.1%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

CHPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -43.20M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in a net margin of -42.4%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHPT and NVDA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPT has higher volatility (25.33%) compared to NVDA (13.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPT dropped -99.51% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPT and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer