PortfoliosLab logo
CHPT vs. PANW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CHPT and PANW is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CHPT vs. PANW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CHPT:

-0.77

PANW:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

CHPT:

-1.10

PANW:

1.17

Omega Ratio

CHPT:

0.88

PANW:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

CHPT:

-0.64

PANW:

0.91

Martin Ratio

CHPT:

-1.25

PANW:

2.73

Ulcer Index

CHPT:

50.59%

PANW:

8.94%

Daily Std Dev

CHPT:

82.86%

PANW:

36.20%

Max Drawdown

CHPT:

-98.83%

PANW:

-47.98%

Current Drawdown

CHPT:

-98.49%

PANW:

-6.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHPT:

$327.38M

PANW:

$127.77B

EPS

CHPT:

-$0.64

PANW:

$1.78

PS Ratio

CHPT:

0.78

PANW:

14.91

PB Ratio

CHPT:

2.38

PANW:

20.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHPT:

$310.04M

PANW:

$6.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHPT:

$77.07M

PANW:

$4.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

CHPT:

-$161.51M

PANW:

$1.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPT achieves a -34.87% return, which is significantly lower than PANW's 6.78% return.


CHPT

YTD

-34.87%

1M

23.54%

6M

-37.78%

1Y

-63.51%

3Y*

-60.16%

5Y*

-41.12%

10Y*

N/A

PANW

YTD

6.78%

1M

15.87%

6M

0.46%

1Y

22.26%

3Y*

34.54%

5Y*

37.82%

10Y*

21.75%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CHPT vs. PANW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHPT is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PANW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PANW is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PANW is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PANW is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PANW is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PANW is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PANW is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CHPT vs. PANW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CHPT Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the PANW Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPT and PANW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CHPT vs. PANW - Dividend Comparison

Neither CHPT nor PANW has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CHPT vs. PANW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPT drawdown since its inception was -98.83%, which is greater than PANW's maximum drawdown of -47.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPT and PANW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CHPT vs. PANW - Volatility Comparison

ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a higher volatility of 16.66% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) at 8.76%. This indicates that CHPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PANW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CHPT vs. PANW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
101.89M
2.26B
(CHPT) Total Revenue
(PANW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHPT vs. PANW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025
28.2%
73.5%
(CHPT) Gross Margin
(PANW) Gross Margin
CHPT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.70M and revenue of 101.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.66B and revenue of 2.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.5%.

CHPT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -54.95M and revenue of 101.89M, resulting in an operating margin of -53.9%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of 240.40M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

CHPT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -58.80M and revenue of 101.89M, resulting in a net margin of -57.7%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of 267.30M and revenue of 2.26B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.