CHPT vs. BLNK
CHPT (ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.) and BLNK (Blink Charging Co.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, CHPT returned -58.68%/yr vs -56.07%/yr for BLNK. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
CHPT vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPT achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly higher than BLNK's -2.16% return.
CHPT
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 12.96%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- -41.17%
- 3Y*
- -62.23%
- 5Y*
- -58.68%
- 10Y*
- —
BLNK
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -20.43%
- YTD
- -2.16%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- -29.90%
- 3Y*
- -51.33%
- 5Y*
- -56.07%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPT vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPT ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | 19.43% | -68.97% | -54.27% | -75.45% | -49.97% | -52.47% | 308.98% | 1.55% |
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | -2.16% | -52.01% | -59.00% | -69.10% | -58.62% | -37.99% | 2,198.39% | -33.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPT and BLNK is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CHPT and BLNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CHPT:
$195.32M
BLNK:
$93.43M
CHPT:
-$8.70
BLNK:
-$0.63
CHPT:
0.45
BLNK:
0.74
CHPT:
$415.40M
BLNK:
$103.40M
CHPT:
$125.56M
BLNK:
$24.62M
CHPT:
-$162.44M
BLNK:
-$58.57M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPT vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank
CHPT
BLNK
CHPT vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.02 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | -0.38 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.90 | -0.55 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPT vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPT drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, roughly equal to the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPT and BLNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.51% | -99.17% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.00% | -79.94% | +9.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.50% | -92.69% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.37% | -98.93% | -0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.14% | -98.93% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.06% | -73.53% | +8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.96% | 54.36% | -8.40% |
Volatility
CHPT vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a higher volatility of 28.30% compared to Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) at 16.29%. This indicates that CHPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPT | BLNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.30% | 16.29% | +12.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.54% | 63.22% | -16.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.35% | 96.32% | -26.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.85% | 83.12% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.97% | 121.19% | -44.22% |
Dividends
CHPT vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHPT nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHPT vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHPT vs. BLNK - Profitability Comparison
CHPT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.94M and revenue of 101.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
BLNK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a gross profit of 6.64M and revenue of 20.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.0%.
CHPT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.80M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.1%.
BLNK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported an operating income of -11.78M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.7%.
CHPT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -43.20M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in a net margin of -42.4%.
BLNK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a net income of -11.56M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in a net margin of -55.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPT and BLNK have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPT has higher volatility (28.30%) compared to BLNK (16.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPT dropped -99.51% vs BLNK's -99.17%.
BLNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.31 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPT and BLNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer