CHPT vs. SLDP
CHPT (ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.) and SLDP (Solid Power, Inc.) are both stocks. CHPT operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while SLDP operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CHPT returned -59.03%/yr vs -26.98%/yr for SLDP. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CHPT vs. SLDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPT achieves a -17.77% return, which is significantly higher than SLDP's -51.53% return.
CHPT
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- 6M
- -8.85%
- YTD
- -17.77%
- 1Y
- -42.41%
- 3Y*
- -68.09%
- 5Y*
- -59.03%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -40.48%
SLDP
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -18.25%
- 6M
- -54.02%
- YTD
- -51.53%
- 1Y
- -33.76%
- 3Y*
- -10.36%
- 5Y*
- -26.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.07M | $2.80M | $4.27M | |
| $8.45M | $8.87M | $15.65M |
CHPT vs. SLDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPT ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | -17.77% | -68.97% | -54.27% | -75.45% | -49.97% | -17.46% |
SLDP Solid Power, Inc. | -51.53% | 124.87% | 30.34% | -42.91% | -70.94% | -12.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPT and SLDP is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2021 | 0.51 |
The correlation between CHPT and SLDP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CHPT:
$141.40M
SLDP:
$463.47M
CHPT:
-$8.62
SLDP:
-$0.75
CHPT:
0.31
SLDP:
14.15
CHPT:
$415.40M
SLDP:
$17.84M
CHPT:
$125.56M
SLDP:
-$2.22M
CHPT:
-$162.44M
SLDP:
-$63.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPT vs. SLDP — Risk / Return Rank
CHPT
SLDP
CHPT vs. SLDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPT | SLDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.02 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.46 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | -0.71 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPT vs. SLDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPT drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, which is greater than SLDP's maximum drawdown of -93.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPT and SLDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPT | SLDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.51% | -93.46% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.78% | -76.50% | +12.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.20% | -76.50% | -20.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.19% | -93.46% | -5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.41% | -85.46% | -13.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.61% | -69.06% | +3.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.91% | 50.07% | -9.16% |
Volatility
CHPT vs. SLDP - Volatility Comparison
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP) at 17.17%. This indicates that CHPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLDP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPT | SLDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.49% | 17.17% | +2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.07% | 45.91% | +10.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.94% | 107.67% | -35.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.33% | 87.02% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.33% | 85.77% | -8.44% |
Dividends
CHPT vs. SLDP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHPT nor SLDP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHPT vs. SLDP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and Solid Power, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPT and SLDP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPT has higher volatility (19.49%) compared to SLDP (17.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPT dropped -99.51% vs SLDP's -93.46%.
SLDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPT and SLDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer