CHPT vs. NIO
CHPT (ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.) and NIO (NIO Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — CHPT in Specialty Retail, NIO in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 5 years, CHPT returned -58.15%/yr vs -33.73%/yr for NIO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHPT vs. NIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPT achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than NIO's 5.10% return.
CHPT
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- -30.78%
- 1Y
- -46.68%
- 3Y*
- -66.34%
- 5Y*
- -58.15%
- 10Y*
- —
NIO
- 1D
- -5.80%
- 1M
- -9.15%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 48.07%
- 3Y*
- -12.05%
- 5Y*
- -33.73%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPT vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPT ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | 8.73% | -68.97% | -54.27% | -75.45% | -49.97% | -52.47% | 308.98% | 0.41% |
NIO NIO Inc. | 5.10% | 16.97% | -51.93% | -6.97% | -69.22% | -35.00% | 1,112.44% | 28.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPT and NIO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CHPT and NIO has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
CHPT:
$177.83M
NIO:
$13.30B
CHPT:
-$8.70
NIO:
-$3.74
CHPT:
0.41
NIO:
0.13
CHPT:
$415.40M
NIO:
$100.51B
CHPT:
$125.56M
NIO:
$15.77B
CHPT:
-$162.44M
NIO:
-$7.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPT vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPT
NIO
CHPT vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHPT | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.17 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | 1.10 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 1.98 | -2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHPT | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | 0.77 | -1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.73 | -0.47 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.51 | -0.03 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
CHPT vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPT drawdown since its inception was -99.51%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPT and NIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPT | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.51% | -95.00% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.61% | -43.73% | -28.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.69% | -79.69% | -18.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.37% | -94.10% | -5.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.22% | -91.47% | -7.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.89% | -67.88% | +2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.89% | 24.39% | +24.50% |
Volatility
CHPT vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) has a higher volatility of 25.33% compared to NIO Inc. (NIO) at 19.56%. This indicates that CHPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPT | NIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.33% | 19.56% | +5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.35% | 41.15% | +9.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.51% | 62.99% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.59% | 71.69% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.94% | 86.71% | -9.77% |
Dividends
CHPT vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison
Neither CHPT nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CHPT vs. NIO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHPT vs. NIO - Profitability Comparison
CHPT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 27.94M and revenue of 101.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
NIO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.86B and revenue of 25.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.0%.
CHPT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.80M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in an operating margin of -38.1%.
NIO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported an operating income of -308.81M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.2%.
CHPT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -43.20M and revenue of 101.82M, resulting in a net margin of -42.4%.
NIO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NIO Inc. reported a net income of -496.01M and revenue of 25.53B, resulting in a net margin of -1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPT and NIO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHPT has higher volatility (25.33%) compared to NIO (19.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPT dropped -99.51% vs NIO's -95.00%.
NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHPT and NIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer