CHPS vs. MSTZ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) and MSTZ (T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index, while MSTZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by REX. CHPS is passively managed, while MSTZ is actively managed. Over the past year, CHPS returned 161.82% vs 264.10% for MSTZ. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. CHPS charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for MSTZ.

Performance

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS achieves a 97.54% return, which is significantly higher than MSTZ's -26.97% return.

CHPS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -3.32%
• 6M: 77.90%
• YTD: 97.54%
• 1Y: 161.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSTZ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: 39.32%
• 6M: -19.19%
• YTD: -26.97%
• 1Y: 264.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	97.54%	58.47%	-2.31%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	-26.97%	-38.95%	-94.43%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS and MSTZ is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024	-0.37

Return for Risk

CHPS vs. MSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

MSTZ

MSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 60
MSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
MSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
MSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
MSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS	MSTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.82	1.64	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.34	+1.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.30	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.14	2.86	+6.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	30.08	5.59	+24.49

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS Sharpe Ratio is 3.82, which is higher than the MSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS and MSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS drawdown since its inception was -39.44%, smaller than the maximum MSTZ drawdown of -99.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS and MSTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS	MSTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.44%	-99.38%	+59.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	-84.89%	+67.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.24%	-97.51%	+84.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.11%	-94.53%	+85.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.38%	43.41%	-38.03%

Volatility

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) is 22.94%, while T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTZ) has a volatility of 56.46%. This indicates that CHPS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS	MSTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.94%	56.46%	-33.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.25%	135.20%	-97.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.41%	148.41%	-106.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.33%	171.17%	-134.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.33%	171.17%	-134.84%

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTZ's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS vs. MSTZ - Dividend Comparison

CHPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while MSTZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.33%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
MSTZ T-REX 2X Inverse MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS and MSTZ in my portfolio?

CHPS and MSTZ have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHPS or MSTZ?

MSTZ has higher volatility (56.46%) compared to CHPS (22.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHPS dropped -39.44% vs MSTZ's -99.38%.

Which ETF is better, CHPS or MSTZ?

On 1-year performance, MSTZ leads with 264.10% vs 161.82% for CHPS. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CHPS has been the lower-risk option at 22.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CHPS or MSTZ?

Over the 1-year period, MSTZ has performed better with a 264.10% return vs 161.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS or MSTZ?

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CHPS or MSTZ?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for MSTZ.

What is the main difference between CHPS and MSTZ?

CHPS is categorized as Semiconductors, while MSTZ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CHPS and 1.05% for MSTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.82 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.