PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHPS.TO vs. SPTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CHPS.TO is traded in CAD, while SPTE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPTE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 66.03% return, which is significantly higher than SPTE's 43.60% return.


CHPS.TO

1D
0.93%
1M
28.67%
YTD
66.03%
6M
59.28%
1Y
134.35%
3Y*
51.56%
5Y*
10Y*

SPTE

1D
-0.80%
1M
20.24%
YTD
43.60%
6M
40.75%
1Y
76.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
66.03%45.93%20.38%11.04%
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
43.60%20.58%44.73%3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and SPTE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2023

0.86

The correlation between CHPS.TO and SPTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CHPS.TO
SPTE

Technology

100.0%
98.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CHPS.TO
100.0%
SPTE
98.6%

Basic Materials

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Communication Services

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Consumer Cyclical

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Consumer Defensive

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Energy

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE
0.1%

Financial Services

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Healthcare

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE
0.2%

Industrials

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE
0.3%

Real Estate

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Utilities

CHPS.TO

-

SPTE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO
CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SPTE
SPTE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SPTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPTE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SPTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHPS.TOSPTEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.30

3.56

+0.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.53

4.33

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.58

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.12

6.30

+3.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

30.54

21.29

+9.25

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is comparable to the SPTE Sharpe Ratio of 3.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and SPTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHPS.TOSPTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.30

3.56

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.87

-0.96

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than SPTE's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and SPTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHPS.TOSPTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.16%

-26.13%

-22.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.35%

-12.23%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.80%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.90%

-4.10%

-9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.42%

3.61%

+0.81%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.35% compared to SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF (SPTE) at 7.57%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHPS.TOSPTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.35%

7.57%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.81%

17.40%

+7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.48%

21.64%

+9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

25.03%

+8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.79%

25.03%

+8.76%

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. SPTE - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPTE's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CHPS.TO
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF
0.01%0.01%0.20%0.53%0.97%0.01%
SPTE
SP Funds S&P Global Technology ETF
0.67%0.96%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CHPS.TO and SPTE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPTE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPTE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.

CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while SPTE is Technology Equities. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while SPTE tracks S&P Global 1200 Shariah Information Technology Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.55% for SPTE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and SPTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer