CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and HDIF.TO (Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while HDIF.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest. CHPS.TO is passively managed, while HDIF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CHPS.TO returned 47.55%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for HDIF.TO. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for HDIF.TO.

Performance

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 60.68% return, which is significantly higher than HDIF.TO's 11.43% return.

CHPS.TO

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: 13.58%
• YTD: 60.68%
• 6M: 61.37%
• 1Y: 123.06%
• 3Y*: 47.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HDIF.TO

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: 11.43%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 28.27%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	60.68%	45.93%	20.38%	68.20%	-31.07%
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	11.43%	15.70%	18.44%	12.76%	-14.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022	0.63

The correlation between CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CHPS.TO	HDIF.TO
Technology	100.0%	27.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	5.3%
Financial Services	-	15.6%
Healthcare	-	11.4%
Industrials	-	9.4%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	5.0%

Return for Risk

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHPS.TO

CHPS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CHPS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

HDIF.TO

HDIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
HDIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
HDIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HDIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HDIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHPS.TO	HDIF.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.56	2.07	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.81	2.81	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.37	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.12	3.06	+6.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.48	12.56	+13.93

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHPS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, which is greater than HDIF.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHPS.TO	HDIF.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.16%	-24.08%	-24.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.35%	-8.79%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.49%	-19.59%	-17.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.22%	-0.84%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-6.63%	-7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	2.14%	+2.41%

Volatility

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.67% compared to Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) at 4.52%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDIF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHPS.TO	HDIF.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.67%	4.52%	+11.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.93%	10.75%	+17.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.16%	12.99%	+21.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.50%	17.49%	+17.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.50%	17.49%	+17.01%

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HDIF.TO's 2.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHPS.TO vs. HDIF.TO - Dividend Comparison

CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than HDIF.TO's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.20%	0.53%	0.97%	0.01%
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	10.23%	9.95%	10.14%	10.59%	8.93%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO in my portfolio?

CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CHPS.TO or HDIF.TO?

On fees, CHPS.TO is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CHPS.TO or HDIF.TO?

CHPS.TO is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

What is the main difference between CHPS.TO and HDIF.TO?

CHPS.TO is categorized as Semiconductors, while HDIF.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Harvest. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 2.47% for HDIF.TO.