CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO
CHPS.TO (Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF) and CARS.TO (Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units) are both exchange-traded funds - CHPS.TO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while CARS.TO is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Solactive Future Cars Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHPS.TO returned 25.57%/yr vs -11.05%/yr for CARS.TO. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CHPS.TO charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for CARS.TO.
Performance
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHPS.TO achieves a 44.43% return, which is significantly higher than CARS.TO's 3.43% return.
CHPS.TO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -10.50%
- 6M
- 32.24%
- YTD
- 44.43%
- 1Y
- 75.11%
- 3Y*
- 40.71%
- 5Y*
- 25.57%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.08%
CARS.TO
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -12.78%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- -4.42%
- 5Y*
- -11.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$104.33K | CA$73.30K | CA$56.87K | |
| CA$6.23M | CA$6.24M | CA$7.42M |
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 44.43% | 45.93% | 20.38% | 68.20% | -37.86% | 23.13% |
CARS.TO Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units | 3.43% | 25.71% | -11.53% | -5.42% | -49.72% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHPS.TO and CARS.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CHPS.TO and CARS.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHPS.TO
CARS.TO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
CHPS.TO
CARS.TO
Basic Materials
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Communication Services
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
Consumer Defensive
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Energy
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Financial Services
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Healthcare
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Industrials
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
Real Estate
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
-
Utilities
CHPS.TO
-
CARS.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CHPS.TO
CARS.TO
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) and Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units (CARS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHPS.TO | CARS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.12 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 0.62 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.18 | 1.56 | +10.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHPS.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.16%, smaller than the maximum CARS.TO drawdown of -74.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHPS.TO and CARS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHPS.TO | CARS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.16% | -74.55% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.71% | -32.50% | +9.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.49% | -48.28% | +10.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.16% | -73.61% | +25.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.00% | -54.86% | +37.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -34.13% | +20.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 12.88% | -6.92% |
Volatility
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.23% compared to Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units (CARS.TO) at 12.61%. This indicates that CHPS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHPS.TO | CARS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.23% | 12.61% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.34% | 30.68% | +2.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.46% | 37.66% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.50% | 36.25% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.33% | 34.32% | +1.01% |
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHPS.TO has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than CARS.TO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHPS.TO vs. CARS.TO - Dividend Comparison
CHPS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than CARS.TO's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARS.TO Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units | 1.02% | 0.85% | 1.35% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.44% | 0.27% | 0.53% | 1.79% | 0.45% |
CHPS.TO Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.20% | 0.53% | 0.97% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHPS.TO and CARS.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CARS.TO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CARS.TO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CHPS.TO.
CHPS.TO is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while CARS.TO is Consumer Discretionary Equities. CHPS.TO tracks PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index, while CARS.TO tracks Solactive Future Cars Index Canadian Dollar Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for CHPS.TO and 0.56% for CARS.TO.
Find the right allocation for CHPS.TO and CARS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer