PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units (CARS.TO) and Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARS.TO achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly higher than LEAD.TO's -4.13% return.


CARS.TO

1D
-4.86%
1M
-18.39%
6M
-5.74%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
-2.60%
5Y*
-10.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.00%

LEAD.TO

1D
-1.14%
1M
1.87%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
-4.13%
1Y
-3.93%
3Y*
18.17%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$74.52KCA$52.07KCA$48.98K
CA$5.33KCA$6.18KCA$7.84K

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units
3.49%25.71%-11.53%-5.42%-49.72%4.23%61.85%
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund
-4.13%12.13%38.23%34.98%-34.79%14.98%7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between CARS.TO and LEAD.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2020

0.42

The correlation between CARS.TO and LEAD.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARS.TO
CARS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
CARS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CARS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

LEAD.TO
LEAD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
LEAD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEAD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units (CARS.TO) and Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CARS.TOLEAD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

-0.15

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.16

-0.33

+1.48

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the LEAD.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARS.TO and LEAD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARS.TO drawdown since its inception was -74.55%, which is greater than LEAD.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARS.TO and LEAD.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CARS.TOLEAD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.55%

-39.80%

-34.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.57%

-22.65%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.98%

-22.65%

-28.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.61%

-39.80%

-33.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.84%

-9.30%

-45.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-13.81%

-20.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.14%

10.12%

+2.02%

Volatility

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Volatility Comparison

Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units (CARS.TO) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to Evolve Future Leadership Fund (LEAD.TO) at 5.40%. This indicates that CARS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEAD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CARS.TOLEAD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.63%

5.40%

+9.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.66%

14.99%

+15.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.56%

18.57%

+18.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.29%

21.80%

+14.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.32%

21.02%

+13.30%

Dividends

CARS.TO vs. LEAD.TO - Dividend Comparison

CARS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than LEAD.TO's 11.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CARS.TO
Evolve Automobile Innovation Index Fund - Hedged Units
1.00%0.85%1.35%1.01%0.95%0.44%0.27%0.53%1.79%0.45%
LEAD.TO
Evolve Future Leadership Fund
11.67%9.21%5.84%7.25%9.02%5.44%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CARS.TO and LEAD.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CARS.TO is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while LEAD.TO is Global Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CARS.TO and LEAD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer