CHIQ vs. AIQ
CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CHIQ returned -10.19%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for AIQ. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CHIQ charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHIQ achieves a -16.55% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 20.17% return.
CHIQ
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- 6M
- -17.42%
- YTD
- -16.55%
- 1Y
- -16.73%
- 3Y*
- -0.91%
- 5Y*
- -10.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- 6M
- 16.91%
- YTD
- 20.17%
- 1Y
- 39.70%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -16.55% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -29.03% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 20.17% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -14.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHIQ and AIQ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CHIQ and AIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CHIQ
AIQ
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
CHIQ
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
CHIQ
AIQ
-
Industrials
CHIQ
AIQ
Real Estate
CHIQ
AIQ
-
Technology
CHIQ
AIQ
Basic Materials
CHIQ
-
AIQ
-
Communication Services
CHIQ
-
AIQ
Energy
CHIQ
-
AIQ
-
Financial Services
CHIQ
-
AIQ
Healthcare
CHIQ
-
AIQ
Utilities
CHIQ
-
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHIQ vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
CHIQ
AIQ
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHIQ | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.26 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 2.42 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 7.00 | -8.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHIQ drawdown since its inception was -67.04%, which is greater than AIQ's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHIQ and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHIQ | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.04% | -44.66% | -22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.53% | -16.47% | -19.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.53% | -26.35% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.55% | -44.66% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.22% | -12.86% | -43.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.79% | -9.78% | -21.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.74% | 5.68% | +10.06% |
Volatility
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) is 7.67%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 11.99%. This indicates that CHIQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHIQ | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.67% | 11.99% | -4.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.38% | 23.93% | -7.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.90% | 27.53% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.73% | 26.24% | +11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.44% | 25.91% | +6.53% |
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHIQ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
CHIQ vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
CHIQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than AIQ's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.07% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.62% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHIQ and AIQ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to CHIQ (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHIQ dropped -67.04% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 15.47% vs -10.19% for CHIQ. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 15.47% return vs -10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 0.07% for AIQ.
CHIQ is categorized as China Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CHIQ and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHIQ and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer