CHI vs. ACP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHI (Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund) and ACP (abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund) are both mutual funds - CHI is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos, while ACP is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CHI returned 13.49%/yr vs 5.85%/yr for ACP. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CHI charges 0.88%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for ACP.

Performance

CHI vs. ACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHI achieves a 29.12% return, which is significantly higher than ACP's 3.36% return. Over the past 10 years, CHI has outperformed ACP with an annualized return of 13.49%, while ACP has yielded a comparatively lower 5.85% annualized return.

CHI

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 5.21%
• YTD: 29.12%
• 6M: 25.13%
• 1Y: 42.44%
• 3Y*: 17.77%
• 5Y*: 7.12%
• 10Y*: 13.49%

ACP

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -1.57%
• YTD: 3.36%
• 6M: 4.09%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: 8.07%
• 5Y*: 0.39%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHI vs. ACP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHI Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund	29.12%	-2.15%	27.23%	9.49%	-23.31%	20.31%	33.82%	35.66%	-12.67%	22.70%
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	3.36%	6.48%	4.81%	19.27%	-22.87%	6.65%	7.51%	26.93%	-17.64%	15.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CHI and ACP is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011	0.34

Return for Risk

CHI vs. ACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHI

CHI Risk / Return Rank: 81
CHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
CHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
CHI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
CHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CHI Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ACP

ACP Risk / Return Rank: 6
ACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ACP Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHI vs. ACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) and abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHI	ACP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.48	0.47	+2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.32	0.73	+2.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.09	+0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.98	0.52	+3.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.67	1.46	+14.21

CHI vs. ACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHI Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the ACP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHI and ACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHI vs. ACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHI drawdown since its inception was -64.72%, which is greater than ACP's maximum drawdown of -51.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHI and ACP.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHI	ACP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.72%	-51.03%	-13.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.71%	-10.51%	-0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.52%	-18.97%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.03%	-38.83%	+2.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.64%	-51.03%	+1.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-7.24%	+5.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.65%	-11.10%	+1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	3.72%	-1.00%

Volatility

CHI vs. ACP - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund (CHI) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund (ACP) at 3.76%. This indicates that CHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHI	ACP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.49%	3.76%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.08%	9.56%	+4.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.22%	11.64%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.15%	16.97%	+3.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.22%	21.09%	+2.13%

CHI vs. ACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ACP's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHI vs. ACP - Dividend Comparison

CHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than ACP's 18.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACP abrdn Income Credit Strategies Fund	18.13%	17.19%	19.72%	17.65%	17.70%	11.76%	12.73%	12.27%	12.60%	10.26%	10.72%	12.69%
CHI Calamos Convertible Opportunities and Income Fund	8.77%	10.88%	9.55%	11.00%	10.85%	7.54%	6.75%	8.49%	12.19%	10.19%	11.30%	11.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHI and ACP in my portfolio?

CHI and ACP have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHI or ACP?

CHI has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to ACP (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHI dropped -64.72% vs ACP's -51.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.