CHHQY vs. GFI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI).

Performance

CHHQY vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CHHQY vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CHHQY China Hongqiao Group Limited	7.74%	244.11%	59.73%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	13.45%	240.42%	-14.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CHHQY : $44.94B GFI : $43.05B
EPS CHHQY : $34.79 GFI : $5.39
PE Ratio CHHQY : 1.30 GFI : 8.93
PEG Ratio CHHQY : 0.07 GFI : 0.14
PS Ratio CHHQY : 0.18 GFI : 3.08
PB Ratio CHHQY : 0.34 GFI : 5.10
Total Revenue (TTM) CHHQY : $238.94B GFI : $13.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) CHHQY : $61.94B GFI : $7.34B
EBITDA (TTM) CHHQY : $60.28B GFI : $8.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHHQY achieves a 7.74% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's 13.45% return.

CHHQY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 7.74%
• YTD: 7.74%
• 6M: 38.55%
• 1Y: 147.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GFI

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: -14.48%
• YTD: 13.45%
• 6M: 18.67%
• 1Y: 119.94%
• 3Y*: 58.55%
• 5Y*: 41.26%
• 10Y*: 31.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CHHQY vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHHQY

CHHQY Risk / Return Rank: 97
CHHQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHHQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CHHQY Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CHHQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHHQY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

GFI

GFI Risk / Return Rank: 87
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHHQY vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CHHQY	GFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	1.98	+0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.46	2.31	+2.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	3.35	1.32	+2.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.71	3.66	+5.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.89	11.55	+7.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CHHQY vs. GFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHHQY Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHHQY and GFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CHHQY	GFI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52	1.98	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.69	0.15	+2.54

Correlation

The correlation between CHHQY and GFI is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CHHQY vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

CHHQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than GFI's 3.83% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHHQY China Hongqiao Group Limited	2.90%	3.12%	8.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	3.83%	1.77%	2.94%	2.87%	3.40%	3.24%	1.72%	0.81%	1.61%	1.41%	1.35%	0.60%

Drawdowns

CHHQY vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHHQY drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHHQY and GFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHHQY	GFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.94%	-88.05%	+71.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.94%	-34.63%	+17.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-56.22%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.00%	-19.47%	+6.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.66%	-44.43%	+41.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.81%	10.97%	-3.16%

Volatility

CHHQY vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI) have volatilities of 20.82% and 19.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHHQY	GFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.82%	19.95%	+0.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.00%	48.31%	-15.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.91%	61.00%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.35%	51.62%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.35%	55.33%	-2.98%

Financials

CHHQY vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Hongqiao Group Limited and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CHHQY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported a gross profit of 20.32B and revenue of 79.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

CHHQY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported an operating income of 17.44B and revenue of 79.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

CHHQY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported a net income of 10.09B and revenue of 79.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.