CHHQY vs. GFI
CHHQY (China Hongqiao Group Limited) and GFI (Gold Fields Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — CHHQY in Aluminum, GFI in Gold. Over the past year, CHHQY returned 86.45% vs 42.17% for GFI. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHHQY vs. GFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHHQY achieves a -26.75% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -22.64% return.
CHHQY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -27.18%
- YTD
- -26.75%
- 6M
- -26.75%
- 1Y
- 86.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GFI
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -20.24%
- YTD
- -22.64%
- 6M
- -26.59%
- 1Y
- 42.17%
- 3Y*
- 36.61%
- 5Y*
- 33.83%
- 10Y*
- 24.85%
CHHQY vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CHHQY China Hongqiao Group Limited | -26.75% | 244.11% | 59.73% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -22.64% | 240.42% | -11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHHQY and GFI is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2024 | 0.02 |
Fundamentals
CHHQY:
$28.93B
GFI:
$29.35B
CHHQY:
CN¥34.79
GFI:
$5.39
CHHQY:
5.69
GFI:
6.09
CHHQY:
0.30
GFI:
0.10
CHHQY:
0.80
GFI:
2.10
CHHQY:
1.48
GFI:
3.48
CHHQY:
CN¥238.94B
GFI:
$13.98B
CHHQY:
CN¥61.94B
GFI:
$7.34B
CHHQY:
CN¥60.28B
GFI:
$8.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHHQY vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank
CHHQY
GFI
CHHQY vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHHQY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.94 | 1.16 | +0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 0.91 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 2.37 | +5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHHQY vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHHQY drawdown since its inception was -40.85%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHHQY and GFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHHQY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.85% | -88.05% | +47.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.85% | -46.66% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.85% | -45.09% | +4.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -44.24% | +39.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.40% | 17.87% | -6.47% |
Volatility
CHHQY vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison
China Hongqiao Group Limited (CHHQY) has a higher volatility of 25.26% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 20.41%. This indicates that CHHQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHHQY | GFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.26% | 20.41% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.67% | 48.15% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.57% | 61.46% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.61% | 52.73% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.61% | 54.92% | -1.31% |
Dividends
CHHQY vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison
CHHQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than GFI's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHHQY China Hongqiao Group Limited | 7.23% | 3.12% | 8.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.61% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
CHHQY vs. GFI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Hongqiao Group Limited and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHHQY vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison
CHHQY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported a gross profit of 20.32B and revenue of 79.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.5%.
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
CHHQY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported an operating income of 17.44B and revenue of 79.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
CHHQY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Hongqiao Group Limited reported a net income of 10.09B and revenue of 79.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHHQY and GFI have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHHQY has higher volatility (25.26%) compared to GFI (20.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHHQY dropped -40.85% vs GFI's -88.05%.
CHHQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHHQY and GFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer