CHGG vs. TIP
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) is a stock, while TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -16.75%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for TIP. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHGG vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 0.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed TIP with an annualized return of -16.75%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- -6.38%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 27.83%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 1Y
- -21.98%
- 3Y*
- -54.36%
- 5Y*
- -59.36%
- 10Y*
- -16.75%
- ALL TIME*
- -17.30%
TIP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 1.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.73%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | $1.22M | $1.06M | $2.14M |
| $209.70M | $179.93M | $215.65M |
CHGG vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 5.70% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 0.54% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and TIP is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2013 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
TIP
CHGG vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.13 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 1.27 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | 3.39 | -3.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -14.57% | -85.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -1.98% | -73.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -3.71% | -92.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.49% | -14.51% | -84.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -14.51% | -85.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.13% | -1.31% | -97.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.32% | -3.41% | -44.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.36% | 0.74% | +44.62% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 23.66% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 0.73%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.66% | 0.73% | +22.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.86% | 2.52% | +78.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.45% | 3.39% | +108.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 89.24% | 6.19% | +83.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.35% | 5.72% | +65.63% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 4.22% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and TIP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to TIP (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs TIP's -14.57%.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer