CHGG vs. TIP
CHGG (Chegg, Inc.) is a stock, while TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) Index (Series-L). Over the past 10 years, CHGG returned -12.21%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for TIP. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHGG vs. TIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHGG achieves a 44.09% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CHGG has underperformed TIP with an annualized return of -12.21%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively higher 2.59% annualized return.
CHGG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 19.64%
- YTD
- 44.09%
- 6M
- 41.87%
- 1Y
- 11.67%
- 3Y*
- -48.14%
- 5Y*
- -55.15%
- 10Y*
- -12.21%
TIP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.73%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- 2.59%
CHGG vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 44.09% | -42.24% | -85.83% | -55.05% | -17.69% | -66.01% | 138.27% | 33.39% | 74.14% | 121.14% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 1.73% | 6.77% | 1.65% | 3.80% | -12.26% | 5.68% | 10.84% | 8.35% | -1.42% | 2.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHGG and TIP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2013 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHGG vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank
CHGG
TIP
CHGG vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.10 | 1.49 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.29 | -1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.27 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 2.38 | -1.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.73 | 7.17 | -6.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 1.49 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 | 0.18 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.17 | 0.45 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 0.57 | -0.79 |
Drawdowns
CHGG vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHGG drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHGG and TIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.60% | -14.57% | -85.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.54% | -1.98% | -73.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.06% | -4.54% | -91.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.50% | -14.51% | -84.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.60% | -14.51% | -85.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.82% | -0.14% | -98.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.33% | -3.43% | -41.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.00% | 0.66% | +42.34% |
Volatility
CHGG vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison
Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) has a higher volatility of 44.66% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 0.89%. This indicates that CHGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHGG | TIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.66% | 0.89% | +43.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 78.49% | 2.32% | +76.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 120.36% | 3.43% | +116.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.12% | 6.21% | +81.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.71% | 5.74% | +64.97% |
Dividends
CHGG vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison
CHGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHGG Chegg, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIP iShares TIPS Bond ETF | 3.75% | 3.46% | 2.52% | 2.73% | 6.96% | 4.28% | 1.17% | 1.75% | 2.71% | 2.07% | 1.48% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHGG and TIP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHGG has higher volatility (44.66%) compared to TIP (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHGG dropped -99.60% vs TIP's -14.57%.
TIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHGG and TIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer