PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHD vs. TPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CHD vs. TPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHD achieves a 17.09% return, which is significantly lower than TPL's 32.28% return. Over the past 10 years, CHD has underperformed TPL with an annualized return of 8.34%, while TPL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.58% annualized return.


CHD

1D
0.49%
1M
3.73%
YTD
17.09%
6M
16.04%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
2.12%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
8.34%

TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHD vs. TPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
17.09%-18.91%11.96%18.72%-20.41%18.89%25.46%8.36%33.23%15.33%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CHD and TPL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CHD:

$23.23B

TPL:

$26.15B

EPS

CHD:

$3.02

TPL:

$7.30

PE Ratio

CHD:

32.30

TPL:

51.93

PEG Ratio

CHD:

3.53

TPL:

2.75

PS Ratio

CHD:

3.82

TPL:

31.17

PB Ratio

CHD:

5.55

TPL:

16.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CHD:

$6.21B

TPL:

$839.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CHD:

$2.80B

TPL:

$625.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

CHD:

$1.22B

TPL:

$690.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CHD vs. TPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHD
CHD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
CHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHD vs. TPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CHDTPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.06

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.01

0.13

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.03

0.25

-0.27

CHD vs. TPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHD Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the TPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHD and TPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CHD vs. TPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHD drawdown since its inception was -51.52%, smaller than the maximum TPL drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHD and TPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CHDTPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.52%

-73.05%

+21.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-31.68%

+14.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-52.22%

+24.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.72%

-52.50%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.72%

-65.46%

+33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.41%

-33.65%

+21.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-27.27%

+15.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.41%

17.08%

-7.67%

Volatility

CHD vs. TPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD) is 7.00%, while Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that CHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CHDTPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

14.23%

-7.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.90%

38.06%

-22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.99%

46.87%

-24.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.65%

46.25%

-25.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

47.10%

-25.25%

Dividends

CHD vs. TPL - Dividend Comparison

CHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than TPL's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHD
Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
1.24%1.41%1.08%1.15%1.30%0.99%1.10%1.29%1.32%1.51%1.61%1.58%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

CHD vs. TPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
1.47B
236.82M
(CHD) Total Revenue
(TPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CHD vs. TPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Church & Dwight Co., Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
46.4%
0
Portfolio components
CHD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 681.40M and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.

TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CHD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported an operating income of 291.00M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.8%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

CHD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Church & Dwight Co., Inc. reported a net income of 216.30M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CHD and TPL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to CHD (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHD dropped -51.52% vs TPL's -73.05%.

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CHD and TPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer