CHCGX vs. RYGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CHCGX (Chesapeake Growth Fund) and RYGRX (Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, CHCGX returned 11.28%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for RYGRX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CHCGX charges 1.67%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for RYGRX.

Performance

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHCGX achieves a 2.82% return, which is significantly lower than RYGRX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCGX has underperformed RYGRX with an annualized return of 11.28%, while RYGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.

CHCGX

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 2.82%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: 13.58%
• 5Y*: 4.25%
• 10Y*: 11.28%

RYGRX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 10.34%
• YTD: 35.24%
• 6M: 32.32%
• 1Y: 42.19%
• 3Y*: 27.04%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 14.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund	2.82%	16.21%	10.98%	24.70%	-28.72%	15.48%	24.23%	27.99%	-1.74%	23.65%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	35.24%	11.00%	25.73%	5.80%	-28.71%	26.61%	26.34%	34.13%	-6.28%	23.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CHCGX and RYGRX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.91

The correlation between CHCGX and RYGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CHCGX vs. RYGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHCGX

CHCGX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CHCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
CHCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
CHCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
CHCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CHCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

RYGRX

RYGRX Risk / Return Rank: 66
RYGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
RYGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RYGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RYGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
RYGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CHCGX	RYGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	2.05	-0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.75	-0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.36	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	3.96	-2.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.19	14.75	-9.56

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the RYGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHCGX and RYGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than RYGRX's maximum drawdown of -54.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCGX and RYGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CHCGX	RYGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.09%	-54.22%	-5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.44%	-11.17%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.34%	-24.95%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.28%	-36.57%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.28%	-36.63%	+3.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	0.00%	-1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.40%	-9.39%	-5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	2.99%	+0.46%

Volatility

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) is 4.58%, while Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund (RYGRX) has a volatility of 9.88%. This indicates that CHCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CHCGX	RYGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	9.88%	-5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.73%	18.39%	-7.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.40%	21.58%	-8.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	23.83%	-5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.83%	23.05%	-4.22%

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHCGX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is lower than RYGRX's 2.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

CHCGX vs. RYGRX - Dividend Comparison

CHCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than RYGRX's 3.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund	7.44%	7.65%	1.51%	0.00%	0.00%	5.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYGRX Rydex S&P 500 Pure Growth Fund	3.76%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.81%	4.43%	12.10%	7.15%	6.26%	0.05%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CHCGX and RYGRX in my portfolio?

CHCGX and RYGRX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CHCGX or RYGRX?

RYGRX has higher volatility (9.88%) compared to CHCGX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHCGX dropped -60.09% vs RYGRX's -54.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.