CHCGX vs. IOLZX
Compare and contrast key facts about Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX).
CHCGX is managed by Chesapeake. It was launched on Sep 29, 1997. IOLZX is managed by ICON Funds. It was launched on Oct 17, 2002.
Performance
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund | -11.62% | 16.21% | 10.98% | 24.70% | -28.72% | 15.48% | 24.23% | 27.99% | -1.74% | 23.65% |
IOLZX ICON Equity Fund | -1.68% | 15.81% | 16.87% | 12.13% | -17.78% | 26.72% | 16.00% | 38.22% | -16.69% | 26.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHCGX achieves a -11.62% return, which is significantly lower than IOLZX's -1.68% return. Over the past 10 years, CHCGX has underperformed IOLZX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while IOLZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.
CHCGX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- -11.62%
- 6M
- -9.30%
- 1Y
- 9.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
IOLZX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 19.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CHCGX has a 1.67% expense ratio, which is higher than IOLZX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CHCGX vs. IOLZX — Risk / Return Rank
CHCGX
IOLZX
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) and ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHCGX | IOLZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | 1.29 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.09 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.06 | 3.61 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHCGX | IOLZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.84 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.32 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.53 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between CHCGX and IOLZX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Dividend Comparison
CHCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.66%, less than IOLZX's 10.87% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHCGX Chesapeake Growth Fund | 8.66% | 7.65% | 1.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IOLZX ICON Equity Fund | 10.87% | 10.69% | 22.21% | 4.75% | 18.57% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 3.46% | 1.60% |
Drawdowns
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHCGX drawdown since its inception was -60.09%, which is greater than IOLZX's maximum drawdown of -56.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHCGX and IOLZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHCGX | IOLZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.09% | -56.03% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -15.69% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -27.77% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.28% | -41.04% | +7.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.44% | -13.74% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.50% | -12.72% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.72% | -1.28% |
Volatility
CHCGX vs. IOLZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chesapeake Growth Fund (CHCGX) is 4.71%, while ICON Equity Fund (IOLZX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that CHCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IOLZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CHCGX | IOLZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 6.73% | -2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 14.09% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 23.57% | -5.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 21.32% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 22.25% | -3.52% |