PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CHAU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CHAU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CHAU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
-2.48%47.73%6.61%-28.25%-49.17%-2.84%71.95%70.01%-51.03%74.91%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
11.72%425.05%2.89%2.60%-32.10%-26.31%-60.16%100.73%-44.52%3.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CHAU achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than NUGT's 11.72% return. Over the past 10 years, CHAU has outperformed NUGT with an annualized return of 2.21%, while NUGT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.92% annualized return.


CHAU

1D
0.74%
1M
-8.47%
YTD
-2.48%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
47.33%
3Y*
0.30%
5Y*
-10.61%
10Y*
2.21%

NUGT

1D
8.90%
1M
-33.79%
YTD
11.72%
6M
30.46%
1Y
233.84%
3Y*
71.95%
5Y*
29.87%
10Y*
-0.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CHAU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CHAU has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CHAU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CHAU
CHAU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CHAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CHAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CHAU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CHAUNUGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

2.57

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.76

2.51

-0.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.37

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

4.31

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.42

13.80

-5.38

CHAU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CHAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CHAU and NUGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CHAUNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.57

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.42

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

-0.01

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

-0.32

+0.22

Correlation

The correlation between CHAU and NUGT is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CHAU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

CHAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than NUGT's 0.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CHAU
Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares
2.09%1.97%2.25%3.97%0.77%1.73%0.09%0.58%0.83%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.27%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Drawdowns

CHAU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CHAU drawdown since its inception was -79.21%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAU and NUGT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CHAUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.21%

-99.97%

+20.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-53.58%

+31.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.32%

-73.79%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.58%

-96.91%

+18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.65%

-99.74%

+39.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-91.43%

+32.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.47%

16.75%

-11.28%

Volatility

CHAU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2x Shares (CHAU) is 9.69%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that CHAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CHAUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

33.96%

-24.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.47%

77.66%

-55.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.74%

91.60%

-54.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.97%

70.75%

-23.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.25%

89.98%

-42.73%