CHAT vs. RBOT
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 41.74%/yr vs -86.28%/yr for RBOT. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHAT vs. RBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 42.01% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT's -92.86% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- -5.30%
- 1M
- -12.49%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- YTD
- 42.01%
- 1Y
- 73.94%
- 3Y*
- 41.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT
- 1D
- -11.43%
- 1M
- -38.00%
- 6M
- -94.58%
- YTD
- -92.86%
- 1Y
- -98.64%
- 3Y*
- -86.28%
- 5Y*
- -77.96%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT vs. RBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 42.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -92.86% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -81.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and RBOT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. RBOT — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
RBOT
CHAT vs. RBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.56 | +0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | -1.01 | +4.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | -1.36 | +12.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. RBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum RBOT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and RBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -99.97% | +68.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.54% | -98.91% | +79.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -99.76% | +68.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.54% | -99.97% | +80.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.52% | -70.33% | +64.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 64.49% | -57.82% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. RBOT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) is 16.90%, while Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) has a volatility of 44.86%. This indicates that CHAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.90% | 44.86% | -27.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.39% | 131.88% | -99.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.11% | 145.67% | -108.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.83% | 119.10% | -87.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.83% | 109.63% | -77.80% |
Dividends
CHAT vs. RBOT - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.01% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and RBOT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RBOT has higher volatility (44.86%) compared to CHAT (16.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs RBOT's -99.97%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and RBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer