CHAT vs. RBOT
CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while RBOT (Vicarious Surgical Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CHAT returned 55.51%/yr vs -78.35%/yr for RBOT. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHAT vs. RBOT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHAT achieves a 74.30% return, which is significantly higher than RBOT's -69.15% return.
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RBOT
- 1D
- -10.13%
- 1M
- -25.53%
- YTD
- -69.15%
- 6M
- -79.71%
- 1Y
- -90.69%
- 3Y*
- -78.35%
- 5Y*
- -70.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CHAT vs. RBOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | -69.15% | -83.51% | 19.63% | -82.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHAT and RBOT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHAT vs. RBOT — Risk / Return Rank
CHAT
RBOT
CHAT vs. RBOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) and Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 0.72 | +0.94 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.90 | -0.50 | +9.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.26 | -0.75 | +27.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72 | -0.83 | +5.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.98 | -0.42 | +2.40 |
Drawdowns
CHAT vs. RBOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHAT drawdown since its inception was -31.34%, smaller than the maximum RBOT drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHAT and RBOT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.34% | -99.85% | +68.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.28% | -94.92% | +78.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.34% | -99.03% | +67.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -99.85% | +99.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.35% | -69.76% | +64.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 33.00% | -27.49% |
Volatility
CHAT vs. RBOT - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to Vicarious Surgical Inc. (RBOT) at 2.51%. This indicates that CHAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHAT | RBOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.70% | 2.51% | +9.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.62% | 82.40% | -57.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 124.73% | -93.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 114.18% | -84.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.90% | 106.27% | -76.37% |
Dividends
CHAT vs. RBOT - Dividend Comparison
CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while RBOT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
RBOT Vicarious Surgical Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHAT and RBOT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to RBOT (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHAT dropped -31.34% vs RBOT's -99.85%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHAT and RBOT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer