CHA vs. ASML
CHA (Chagee Holdings Ltd) and ASML (ASML Holding N.V.) are both stocks. CHA operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while ASML operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past year, CHA returned -43.47% vs 137.71% for ASML. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CHA vs. ASML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHA achieves a -3.27% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's 53.00% return.
CHA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- 6M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -3.27%
- 1Y
- -43.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -55.21%
ASML
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 53.00%
- 1Y
- 137.71%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- 32.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 26.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.24B | $3.55B | $3.45B | |
| $4.44M | $5.41M | $7.74M |
CHA vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CHA Chagee Holdings Ltd | -3.27% | -63.22% |
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 53.00% | 70.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHA and ASML is 0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
CHA:
$2.15B
ASML:
$627.85B
CHA:
CN¥4.88
ASML:
€27.54
CHA:
15.55
ASML:
51.36
CHA:
0.19
ASML:
3.38
CHA:
1.12
ASML:
15.47
CHA:
1.87
ASML:
24.94
CHA:
CN¥13.06B
ASML:
€35.33B
CHA:
CN¥5.75B
ASML:
€18.63B
CHA:
CN¥1.10B
ASML:
€13.77B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHA vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank
CHA
ASML
CHA vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chagee Holdings Ltd (CHA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.41 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 6.23 | -7.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 21.34 | -22.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHA vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHA drawdown since its inception was -72.61%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHA and ASML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.61% | -90.00% | +17.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.22% | -21.95% | -36.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -45.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -66.36% | -18.01% | -48.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.29% | -28.04% | -23.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.50% | 6.40% | +36.10% |
Volatility
CHA vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison
Chagee Holdings Ltd (CHA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) have volatilities of 14.96% and 14.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHA | ASML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.96% | 14.49% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.52% | 37.32% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.17% | 46.08% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.02% | 43.25% | +14.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 58.02% | 39.13% | +18.89% |
Dividends
CHA vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison
CHA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than ASML's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASML ASML Holding N.V. | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.97% | 0.86% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.50% | 1.40% | 0.94% | 0.64% | 0.92% | 0.73% |
CHA Chagee Holdings Ltd | 8.18% | 7.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CHA vs. ASML - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chagee Holdings Ltd and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CHA vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison
CHA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chagee Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 3.55B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.6%.
ASML - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 5.04B and revenue of 9.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
CHA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chagee Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 547.16M and revenue of 3.55B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.
ASML - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 3.46B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.1%.
CHA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Chagee Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 450.33M and revenue of 3.55B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
ASML - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.92B and revenue of 9.33B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CHA and ASML have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHA has higher volatility (14.96%) compared to ASML (14.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHA dropped -72.61% vs ASML's -90.00%.
ASML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHA and ASML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer