CH5.L vs. XLVP.L
CH5.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF) and XLVP.L (Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CH5.L returned -3.17%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for XLVP.L. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CH5.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLVP.L.
Performance
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CH5.L achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than XLVP.L's -1.84% return. Over the past 10 years, CH5.L has underperformed XLVP.L with an annualized return of -3.17%, while XLVP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.99% annualized return.
CH5.L
- 1D
- 3.21%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- -3.01%
- 6M
- -1.61%
- 1Y
- 8.05%
- 3Y*
- -26.49%
- 5Y*
- -13.43%
- 10Y*
- -3.17%
XLVP.L
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 6.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH5.L Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF | -3.01% | 11.85% | -63.23% | 5.38% | 1.64% | 17.03% | 3.58% | 24.30% | 0.41% | 6.87% |
XLVP.L Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -1.84% | 6.91% | 3.77% | -3.87% | 8.97% | 29.14% | 8.22% | 16.79% | 10.30% | 11.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CH5.L and XLVP.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2014 | 0.65 |
The correlation between CH5.L and XLVP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CH5.L
XLVP.L
Industrials
-
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Healthcare
CH5.L
XLVP.L
Financial Services
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Technology
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Basic Materials
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Energy
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Utilities
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Real Estate
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Communication Services
CH5.L
XLVP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CH5.L
XLVP.L
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CH5.L | XLVP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 1.41 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.43 | 3.56 | -2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CH5.L | XLVP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 1.10 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.48 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | 0.63 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.71 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CH5.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, which is greater than XLVP.L's maximum drawdown of -19.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CH5.L and XLVP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CH5.L | XLVP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.04% | -19.67% | -50.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -11.56% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.04% | -19.67% | -50.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.04% | -19.67% | -50.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.04% | -19.67% | -50.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.16% | -4.97% | -59.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -4.62% | -10.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.61% | 4.57% | +1.04% |
Volatility
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) and Invesco US Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (XLVP.L) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CH5.L | XLVP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 5.43% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 10.54% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.28% | 14.76% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.85% | 14.25% | +17.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.28% | 15.85% | +9.43% |
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CH5.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CH5.L vs. XLVP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CH5.L nor XLVP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CH5.L and XLVP.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CH5.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CH5.L and 0.14% for XLVP.L.
Find the right allocation for CH5.L and XLVP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer