PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CH5.L vs. XSHC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CH5.L achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly lower than XSHC.L's -2.30% return.


CH5.L

1D
3.21%
1M
1.61%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
8.05%
3Y*
-26.49%
5Y*
-13.43%
10Y*
-3.17%

XSHC.L

1D
2.98%
1M
5.65%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
6.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CH5.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF
-3.01%11.85%-63.23%5.38%1.64%17.03%3.58%24.30%5.93%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
-2.30%6.84%4.08%-3.58%8.14%28.13%9.97%16.71%14.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CH5.L and XSHC.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.64

The correlation between CH5.L and XSHC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CH5.L
XSHC.L

Industrials

37.9%

-

Healthcare

28.0%
100.0%

Financial Services

18.5%

-

Technology

15.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.8%

-

Energy

1.5%

-

Utilities

0.6%

-

Real Estate

0.5%

-

Communication Services

0.0%

-

Industrials

CH5.L
37.9%
XSHC.L

-

Healthcare

CH5.L
28.0%
XSHC.L
100.0%

Financial Services

CH5.L
18.5%
XSHC.L

-

Technology

CH5.L
15.7%
XSHC.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

CH5.L
6.6%
XSHC.L

-

Basic Materials

CH5.L
3.3%
XSHC.L

-

Consumer Defensive

CH5.L
1.8%
XSHC.L

-

Energy

CH5.L
1.5%
XSHC.L

-

Utilities

CH5.L
0.6%
XSHC.L

-

Real Estate

CH5.L
0.5%
XSHC.L

-

Communication Services

CH5.L
0.0%
XSHC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CH5.L
CH5.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
CH5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CH5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CH5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CH5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CH5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XSHC.L
XSHC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSHC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CH5.LXSHC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.18

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.28

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

3.19

-1.75

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CH5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the XSHC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CH5.L and XSHC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CH5.LXSHC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

1.06

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.42

0.47

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.62

-0.60

Drawdowns

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CH5.L drawdown since its inception was -70.04%, which is greater than XSHC.L's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CH5.L and XSHC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CH5.LXSHC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.04%

-19.16%

-50.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.44%

-12.22%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.04%

-19.16%

-50.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.04%

-19.16%

-50.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.16%

-5.62%

-58.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-4.80%

-10.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

4.91%

+0.70%

Volatility

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF (CH5.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D (XSHC.L) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CH5.LXSHC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.43%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

10.56%

+1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

14.72%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.85%

14.22%

+17.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.28%

15.74%

+9.54%

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CH5.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSHC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CH5.L vs. XSHC.L - Dividend Comparison

CH5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSHC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CH5.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Healthcare UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSHC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Health Care UCITS ETF 1D
1.28%1.25%1.25%1.23%1.55%0.85%1.12%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


CH5.L and XSHC.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSHC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSHC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CH5.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CH5.L and 0.12% for XSHC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CH5.L and XSHC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer