CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO
CGXF.TO (CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common) and KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CGXF.TO returned 17.95%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for KILO.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGXF.TO charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for KILO.TO.
Performance
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGXF.TO achieves a -8.39% return, which is significantly lower than KILO.TO's -5.68% return.
CGXF.TO
- 1D
- -3.83%
- 1M
- -6.08%
- YTD
- -8.39%
- 6M
- -12.21%
- 1Y
- 34.27%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- 17.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.36%
KILO.TO
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- —
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | -8.39% | 114.18% | 11.88% | 1.43% | 1.89% | -6.21% | -11.82% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -5.68% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | -4.72% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGXF.TO and KILO.TO is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CGXF.TO and KILO.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CGXF.TO
KILO.TO
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGXF.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 0.76 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 2.01 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -91.79%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXF.TO and KILO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGXF.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.79% | -24.90% | -66.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.65% | -24.90% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -24.90% | -8.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -24.90% | -12.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.19% | -24.51% | -4.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.92% | -6.79% | -38.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 9.44% | +3.11% |
Volatility
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) at 7.88%. This indicates that CGXF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGXF.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.81% | 7.88% | +7.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.84% | 23.72% | +11.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.24% | 27.23% | +15.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.44% | 18.13% | +13.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.64% | 17.86% | +12.78% |
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGXF.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGXF.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.46%, while KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common | 13.46% | 7.43% | 8.09% | 8.93% | 8.54% | 8.59% | 11.00% | 6.69% | 7.97% | 6.99% | 10.68% | 4.82% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGXF.TO and KILO.TO have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for CGXF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: CI and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for CGXF.TO and 0.28% for KILO.TO.
Find the right allocation for CGXF.TO and KILO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer