CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO).

CGXF.TO and AGCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CGXF.TO is an actively managed fund by CI. It was launched on Mar 3, 2022. AGCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Oct 7, 2025.

Performance

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	10.24%	7.58%
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	2.74%	37.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CGXF.TO achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than AGCC.TO's 2.74% return.

CGXF.TO

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -14.66%
• YTD: 10.24%
• 6M: 20.81%
• 1Y: 75.79%
• 3Y*: 35.42%
• 5Y*: 21.92%
• 10Y*: 13.84%

AGCC.TO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -15.31%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CGXF.TO has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than AGCC.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

CGXF.TO

CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common

AGCC.TO

Global X Silver Covered Call ETF

Return for Risk

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CGXF.TO

CGXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 83
CGXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CGXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
CGXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 81
CGXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
CGXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common (CGXF.TO) and Global X Silver Covered Call ETF (AGCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CGXF.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.26	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.14	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CGXF.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	1.51	-1.45

Correlation

The correlation between CGXF.TO and AGCC.TO is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CGXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, more than AGCC.TO's 3.84% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGXF.TO CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF Common	9.24%	7.43%	8.09%	8.92%	8.54%	8.59%	11.01%	6.69%	7.97%	6.99%	10.68%	11.75%
AGCC.TO Global X Silver Covered Call ETF	3.84%	1.49%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CGXF.TO vs. AGCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CGXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than AGCC.TO's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGXF.TO and AGCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CGXF.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-39.17%	-49.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.79%	-31.91%	+17.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.84%	-11.95%	-18.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.46%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CGXF.TO	AGCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.99%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.86%	70.42%	-30.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.17%	70.42%	-40.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.10%	70.42%	-40.32%