CGVV vs. SPYV
CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CGVV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Capital Group, while SPYV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. CGVV is actively managed, while SPYV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYV.
Performance
CGVV vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 7.47% return.
CGVV
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 6M
- 6.91%
- 1Y
- 20.05%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
CGVV vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 13.20% | 6.55% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 7.47% | 11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGVV and SPYV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGVV vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
CGVV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPYV
CGVV vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CGVV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGVV vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGVV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -58.45% | +48.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -1.24% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -8.70% | +7.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.63% | — |
Volatility
CGVV vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGVV | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 9.97% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 14.38% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 16.93% | -3.05% |
CGVV vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGVV vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SPYV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGVV and SPYV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CGVV.
SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.50% for CGVV.
CGVV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.04% for SPYV.
Find the right allocation for CGVV and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer