CGVV vs. MFVL
CGVV (Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CGVV charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFVL.
Performance
CGVV vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CGVV achieves a 13.20% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -2.40% return.
CGVV
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CGVV vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 13.20% | 0.83% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | -2.40% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CGVV and MFVL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CGVV vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF (CGVV) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CGVV vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CGVV drawdown since its inception was -10.11%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CGVV and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CGVV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.11% | -7.03% | -3.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.55% | -5.97% | +4.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -2.60% | +0.99% |
Volatility
CGVV vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CGVV | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 12.14% | +1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 12.14% | +1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.88% | 12.14% | +1.74% |
CGVV vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CGVV has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than MFVL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CGVV vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
CGVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CGVV Capital Group U.S. Large Value ETF | 0.50% | 0.57% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CGVV and MFVL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CGVV is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CGVV is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFVL.
CGVV has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Capital Group and Motley Fool. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CGVV and 0.50% for MFVL.
Find the right allocation for CGVV and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer